2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially Balanced Sampling: Application to Environmental Surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Halton sequence constitutes a good source for a low discrepancy in two dimensions since the selection of small coprime bases ensures a minimal correlation between dimensions (Worley, ) and is therefore regularly used in ecological sampling (Brown et al, ; Kermorvant et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Halton sequence constitutes a good source for a low discrepancy in two dimensions since the selection of small coprime bases ensures a minimal correlation between dimensions (Worley, ) and is therefore regularly used in ecological sampling (Brown et al, ; Kermorvant et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ability is particularly appropriate to monitor natural resources. A three dimensions survey is relevant for monitoring in water bodies (integrating deepness), and a four or more dimensions study design will be able to integrate information such as ecological threats, time intervals, species population structure, environmental data... (Brown et al 2015). If we found that BAS perform well for manila clam's monitoring program in Arcachon bay with only two dimensions (x and y coordinates), we could expect that it will perform even better with more dimensions.…”
Section: Basmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalized random‐tessellation stratified (GRTS) designs are widely used in environmental monitoring surveys. They represent a flexible technique for selecting a spatially balanced probability sampling design (Stevens & Olsen, ; Grafström, Lundström, & Schelin, ; Brown, Robertson, & McDonald, ) in which each potential sampling location has a known, non‐zero probability of being included in the sample. The design ensures that no points in the target population are too far from a sampled point (i.e., points are spread evenly) (Brown et al, ) and that few sampled points are close together.…”
Section: Non‐adaptive Geostatistical Design Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They represent a flexible technique for selecting a spatially balanced probability sampling design (Stevens & Olsen, 2004;Grafström, Lundström, & Schelin, 2012;Brown, Robertson, & McDonald, 2015) in which each potential sampling location has a known, non-zero probability of being included in the sample. The design ensures that no points in the target population are too far from a sampled point (i.e., points are spread evenly) (Brown et al, 2015) and that few sampled points are close together. A GRTS design is formulated using a restricted randomization, referred to as hierarchical randomization, which randomly orders the spatial addresses (Stevens & Olsen, 2003).…”
Section: Other Constructions For Spatially Balanced Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%