2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially and temporally variable urinary N loads deposited by lactating cows on a grazing system dairy farm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, measuring cumulative N 2 O emissions over a full grazing year at the field scale is rarely reported due to the challenging nature of the N 2 O emissions and the lack of large-scale precise measurement instruments. The modelling and prediction of the N 2 O emissions at the field scale is also complicated because of: (i) the heterogeneous distribution of excreta patches of high N concentration (Di & Cameron, 2012;Snow et al, 2017), (ii) excreta patches can overlap which can change the N 2 O emission rates from urine patches (Cichota et al, 2013;Cook & Kelliher, 2016), (iii) the fields considered are often grazed many times each year, (iv) the effect of a single urination on soil can last for several months after deposition and (v) the fate of the nitrogen from excreta strongly depends on the time of deposition (Ahmed et al, 2018;Haynes & Williams, 1993), in relation to climate conditions at urination and the following weeks. The modelled emissions using the excreta maps in this study are likely to be close to the real emissions, although it is difficult to compare it to existing field measurements.…”
Section: Using N Input Mapping To Estimate Cumulative N 2 O Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, measuring cumulative N 2 O emissions over a full grazing year at the field scale is rarely reported due to the challenging nature of the N 2 O emissions and the lack of large-scale precise measurement instruments. The modelling and prediction of the N 2 O emissions at the field scale is also complicated because of: (i) the heterogeneous distribution of excreta patches of high N concentration (Di & Cameron, 2012;Snow et al, 2017), (ii) excreta patches can overlap which can change the N 2 O emission rates from urine patches (Cichota et al, 2013;Cook & Kelliher, 2016), (iii) the fields considered are often grazed many times each year, (iv) the effect of a single urination on soil can last for several months after deposition and (v) the fate of the nitrogen from excreta strongly depends on the time of deposition (Ahmed et al, 2018;Haynes & Williams, 1993), in relation to climate conditions at urination and the following weeks. The modelled emissions using the excreta maps in this study are likely to be close to the real emissions, although it is difficult to compare it to existing field measurements.…”
Section: Using N Input Mapping To Estimate Cumulative N 2 O Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%