“…Previous modeling studies of accretionary wedges have employed physical analog modeling (e.g., Bigi et al, 2010;Ghosh et al, 2020;Gutscher et al, 1996;Koyi, 1995;Lohrmann et al, 2003;Mulugeta & Koyi, 1992;Roy et al, 2020;Saha et al, 2016), work optimization or mechanical approaches to predict the wedge geometry and faulting (Burbidge & Braun, 2002;Cooke & Madden, 2014;Cubas et al, 2008;Del Castello & Cooke, 2007;Gutscher et al, 1998a;Hardy et al, 1998;Leroy & Maillot, 2016;Maillot & Koyi, 2006;Mary et al, 2013;McBeck et al, 2017;Platt, 1986Platt, , 1988Souloumiac et al, 2009Souloumiac et al, , 2010Yagupsky et al, 2014), and numerical simulations (del Castillo et al, 2021;Ito & Moore, 2021;Naylor & Sinclair, 2007;Ruh et al, 2012;Ruh, 2020;Simpson, 2010Simpson, , 2011Stockmal et al, 2007). Early analog modeling studies revealed that the accretion process is episodic rather than steady state (Mulugeta & Koyi, 1992), meaning the wedge does not maintain its original (Mantilla-Pimiento et al, 2009;Rodríguez et al, 2021).…”