1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02733-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variation in evapotranspiration and the influence of land use on catchment hydrology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
87
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy for the liquid and soil water isotope analysis result in a precision limit for lc-excess of about 1.1 and 3.4 ‰, respectively. To infer dynamics of potential evaporation rates, we estimated PET with the Penman-Monteith equation adjusted for the Scottish Highlands by Dunn and Mackay (1995). Note that we focus in our study on the PET dynamics and that the absolute values could vary depending on the aerodynamic and roughness parameter of different vegetation covers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy for the liquid and soil water isotope analysis result in a precision limit for lc-excess of about 1.1 and 3.4 ‰, respectively. To infer dynamics of potential evaporation rates, we estimated PET with the Penman-Monteith equation adjusted for the Scottish Highlands by Dunn and Mackay (1995). Note that we focus in our study on the PET dynamics and that the absolute values could vary depending on the aerodynamic and roughness parameter of different vegetation covers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One site at Braemar situated 15 km from the catchment also had daily snow depth data, which we used. Potential evapotranspiration was estimated using a modified Penman-Monteith equation (Dunn and Mackay 1995).…”
Section: Hydrological and Biogeochemical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An option often considered [Hibbert, 1983;Carlson et al, 1990;Jofre and Rambal, 1993;Davis, 1993] is to replace deep-rooted woody species, which may intercept a substantial amount of precipitation [Eddieman and Miller, 1991] and have high whole-plant transpiration rates due to high leaf areas [Angell and Miller, 1994;Owens, 1996], with shallow-rooted herbaceous vegetation that usually intercepts less precipitation and has less leaf area. The amount of increased water yields from these watersheds, if any, resulting from vegetation management depends upon vegetation type or land use [Dunn and Mackay, 1995], vegetation treatment type or soils [Richardson et al, 1979], and climate [Griffen and McCarl, 1989].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%