The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v38n5p697-704/2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Variability of Soil Resistance to Penetration in No Tillage System

Abstract: In areas of no tillage system where there is intense traffic of machines and minimal soil mobilization, the periodic monitoring allied on localized soil compaction represent important strategies aiming agricultural sustainability. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial variability of soil resistance to penetration (RP) in no tillage system. Data collection took place in an experimental area of 7.65 ha using a sample grid composed of 40 points. At each point the RP was determined by three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil penetration resistance test was performed in each experimental unit using the PenetroLOG-PLG 1020 field penetrometer, with electronic capability for data acquisition (ASABE, 2006), to determine the mean PR and maximum PR stratified in the 0.00-0.10, 0.10-0.20, 0.20-0.30, 0.30-0.40 m-deep layers (Cortez et al, 2018a;Cortez et al, 2018b). Five sampling points were selected in each of the following the positions: sugarcane row, between the tractor wheel tracks and in the tractor wheel tracks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil penetration resistance test was performed in each experimental unit using the PenetroLOG-PLG 1020 field penetrometer, with electronic capability for data acquisition (ASABE, 2006), to determine the mean PR and maximum PR stratified in the 0.00-0.10, 0.10-0.20, 0.20-0.30, 0.30-0.40 m-deep layers (Cortez et al, 2018a;Cortez et al, 2018b). Five sampling points were selected in each of the following the positions: sugarcane row, between the tractor wheel tracks and in the tractor wheel tracks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nugget effect showed a value of zero for all the components and properties assessed. Nugget effect values close to zero indicate more accurate estimates using kriging (Cortez et al, 2018). This occurs because the lower the nugget effect in relation to the variogram baseline, the higher the continuity of the phenomenon and variance of the estimate, and the more reliable the estimate (Bottega et al, 2013;Cortez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A RP é diretamente proporcional aos teores de argila, ou seja, quando se aplica pressão em solos argilosos, a transmissão da resistência à penetração é maior nas camadas mais profundas (DUARTE et al, 2020). A estrutura do solo influencia nos valores de RP, sendo assim, solos argilosos com estrutura adequada, tendem a apresentar melhores condições para o desenvolvimento radicular, com menores valores de DS e RP (CORTEZ et al, 2018). Espera-se que os maiores valores de COS estejam localizados nas camadas mais superficiais do solo e diminuam com o aumento da profundidade (DENARDIN et al, 2014), explicando os resultados apresentados na Figura 10.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified