2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2006.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variability of meiofaunal communities at areas of contrasting depth and productivity in the Aegean Sea (NE Mediterranean)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
37
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
13
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the pronounced inter-replicate variability was consistent with previous studies on small-scale distributions of meiofauna, which have shown that meiobenthic communities can be highly variable even within a few tens of centimetres (De Bovée et al 1990, Agnes et al 2011. The mean values of the meiofauna abundance and biomass along the Malta Escarpment correspond to the range of values reported for other slope areas and for bathyal depths along the Mediterranean Sea continental margins (Soetaert and Heip 1995, Lampadariou and Tselepides 2006, just for stations in the Aegean sea), although these are lower in comparison to other areas at similar depths from other oceans (Soltwedel 2000). Nematodes usually have higher diversity with increasing depth (Coll et al 2010, although a clear trend of increasing or decreasing nematode diversity and species richness with depth is not always found (Lampadariou and Tselepides 2006).…”
Section: Variabilities In the Deep-sea Benthic Components Along The Msupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, the pronounced inter-replicate variability was consistent with previous studies on small-scale distributions of meiofauna, which have shown that meiobenthic communities can be highly variable even within a few tens of centimetres (De Bovée et al 1990, Agnes et al 2011. The mean values of the meiofauna abundance and biomass along the Malta Escarpment correspond to the range of values reported for other slope areas and for bathyal depths along the Mediterranean Sea continental margins (Soetaert and Heip 1995, Lampadariou and Tselepides 2006, just for stations in the Aegean sea), although these are lower in comparison to other areas at similar depths from other oceans (Soltwedel 2000). Nematodes usually have higher diversity with increasing depth (Coll et al 2010, although a clear trend of increasing or decreasing nematode diversity and species richness with depth is not always found (Lampadariou and Tselepides 2006).…”
Section: Variabilities In the Deep-sea Benthic Components Along The Msupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This finding is consistent with previous diversity studies that have reported a complex archaeal population structure of the deep-sea seafloor, and high archaeal diversity in marine sediments (Vetriani et al 1999, Auguet et al 2009). The total meiofauna abundance and biomass did not decrease significantly with depth, in contrast with results from other slope areas, where significant decreases in meiofauna stock with depth have been reported (Cartes et al 2002, Tselepides and; however, the present data are similar to reports by and Lampadariou and Tselepides (2006) from eastern Mediterranean slopes. In the present study, the short bathymetric transect considered may well make it difficult to detect a clear decreasing trend in meiofauna standing stock.…”
Section: Variabilities In the Deep-sea Benthic Components Along The Msupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Δ+ test (average taxonomic distinctness) used in this procedure shows the probability that the taxonomic distinctness of the given list of taxa represents a random selection from a specified faunistic complex. For creating a dataset, the following references were used: Soetaert & Vincx, 1987;Decraemer & Soetaert, 1989;Soetaert, 1989;Lampadariou & Tselepides, 2006;De Leonardis et al, 2008. The taxonomic levels of 'genus-subfamily-family-superfamily-suborder-order-subclass-class' were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%