2018
DOI: 10.5194/tc-12-3137-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variability in snow precipitation and accumulation in COSMO–WRF simulations and radar estimations over complex terrain

Abstract: Abstract. Snow distribution in complex alpine terrain and its evolution in the future climate is important in a variety of applications including hydropower, avalanche forecasting and freshwater resources. However, it is still challenging to quantitatively forecast precipitation, especially over complex terrain where the interaction between local wind and precipitation fields strongly affects snow distribution at the mountain ridge scale. Therefore, it is essential to retrieve high-resolution information about… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For precipitation, particularly wet conditions are simulated by the COSMO-CLM over the Tibetan Plateau. This bias seems to be common to several RCMs for areas characterized by complex topography Gao et al, 2015;Feng and Fu, 2006) and is likely related to an overestimation of orographic precipitation enhancement in the models (Gerber et al, 2018) and/or to an incorrect simulation of the planetary boundary layer (Xu et al, 2016). Additionally, in the COSMO-CLM simulations a significant dry bias occurs over arid and desert regions, especially in summer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For precipitation, particularly wet conditions are simulated by the COSMO-CLM over the Tibetan Plateau. This bias seems to be common to several RCMs for areas characterized by complex topography Gao et al, 2015;Feng and Fu, 2006) and is likely related to an overestimation of orographic precipitation enhancement in the models (Gerber et al, 2018) and/or to an incorrect simulation of the planetary boundary layer (Xu et al, 2016). Additionally, in the COSMO-CLM simulations a significant dry bias occurs over arid and desert regions, especially in summer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The boundaries have a temporal resolution of 6 h and a spectral resolution of T62 (∼ 1.89 • ). NCEP2 data have been selected as boundary data, instead of commonly employed ERA-Interim reanalyses (Dee et al, 2011), since their resolution is closer to the resolution of the three global circulation models (GCMs) that are used for CORDEX-CORE simulations in the CLM community: MPI-ESM (Giorgetta et al, 2013), HadGEM (The HadGEM2 Development Team, 2011) and NorESM Iversen et al, 2013), with a spatial resolution of, respectively, ∼ 210 × 210, ∼ 210 × 140 and ∼ 270×210 km. Thus, using NCEP2 as drivers allows one to reproduce a resolution jump more similar to the one present when using the considered GCMs.…”
Section: Model and Experiments Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground-based radar products are valuable data for evaluating and validating the representation of microphysical processes in atmospheric models (e.g., Gerber et al, 2018, Min et al, 2015, Nicholls et al, 2017. In the austral summer 2015-2016, the intensive Antarctic Precipitation, Remote Sensing from Surface and Space (APRES3) campaign of precipitation observation-including the deployment of a polarimetric radar and of a Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera (hereafter MASC)-took place at Dumont d'Urville (DDU) station, Adélie Land, East Antarctica.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not an easy task, as snow distribution is very complex (Grünewald et al, 2010;Kirchner et al, 2014;Reuter et al, 2016). Since the mountain snow cover is largly shaped by snow transport by wind, adequate modeling can only be achieved through computationally expensive snow drift modeling (Gerber et al, 2018;Mott and Lehning, 2010;Vionnet et al, 2014). While from an operational point of view, high resolution modeling (resolution of several meters) on large domains is presently out of reach, alternative approaches were suggested (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%