Precipitation Partitioning by Vegetation 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29702-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Variability and Temporal Stability of Local Net Precipitation Patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughfall gauges consisted of nine randomly placed funnels (506.7 cm 2 collection area each), three per dogfennel clump (1520.1 cm 2 total collection area per clump), connected to high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles that were manually measured with graduated cylinders immediately after a storm ended (within 4 h). The total canopy area of dogfennel plants at this site rarely exceed 2000 cm 2 ; thus, the total throughfall gauge area per clump generally represented > 75 % of canopy area, which is a comparatively much larger gauge-to-canopy area than most past throughfall studies on forest canopies (Van Stan et al, 2020). Standard stemflow measurement methods developed for woody plants (use of flexible tubing wrapped around a woody stem; Sadeghi et al, 2020) are not suitable for dogfen-nel; moreover, no standard stemflow collection devices exist for herbaceous plants.…”
Section: Understory Throughfall and Stemflow Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Throughfall gauges consisted of nine randomly placed funnels (506.7 cm 2 collection area each), three per dogfennel clump (1520.1 cm 2 total collection area per clump), connected to high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles that were manually measured with graduated cylinders immediately after a storm ended (within 4 h). The total canopy area of dogfennel plants at this site rarely exceed 2000 cm 2 ; thus, the total throughfall gauge area per clump generally represented > 75 % of canopy area, which is a comparatively much larger gauge-to-canopy area than most past throughfall studies on forest canopies (Van Stan et al, 2020). Standard stemflow measurement methods developed for woody plants (use of flexible tubing wrapped around a woody stem; Sadeghi et al, 2020) are not suitable for dogfen-nel; moreover, no standard stemflow collection devices exist for herbaceous plants.…”
Section: Understory Throughfall and Stemflow Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In fact, several long-standing (and hitherto unanswered) calls for greater research on the precipitation partitioning of nonwoody plants (rooted in detailed observations) have been made (Price et al, 1997;Price and Watters, 1989;Verry and Timmons, 1977;Yarie, 1980). These are general questions identified by the community; however, in this study we focus on the following research question: how is overstory throughfall (P T,o : Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is probably because elaborate sampling is required to capture stemflow variance: a random and representative sample is needed, encompassing a high coverage and extent within the study stand. The limited data that are available show that stemflow variation is substantial, and higher for stemflow than for throughfall (Metzger et al, 2017;van Stan et al, 2019). Thus, stemflow contributes importantly and even primarily to net precipitation heterogeneity and flux hot and cold spots and moments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No apparent trends appear to exist in Hoppe's [38] throughfall data with regard to spatial variability and proximity to the nearest stem ( Table 5). Despite these detailed throughfall observations, internationally, Hoppe [38] is most commonly cited for its stemflow data, and it took >50 years before detailed spatial interpolation maps would be developed for throughfall in search of spatial structures, by Linskens [67,68] (an English version of this can be found in [62]). variables, with contradictory results [54][55][56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Canopy Relative Throughfall (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%