2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial-temporal trade-offs of land multi-functionality and function zoning at finer township scale in the middle reaches of the Heihe River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compared our assessment results with our previous research in the middle reaches of the HRB, which evaluated land multifunctionality at the township scale (Meng et al, 2022). The spatial patterns of our land multifunctionality assessment were in accordance with those of our previous study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also compared our assessment results with our previous research in the middle reaches of the HRB, which evaluated land multifunctionality at the township scale (Meng et al, 2022). The spatial patterns of our land multifunctionality assessment were in accordance with those of our previous study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of multifunction measurement of cultivated land, the comprehensive evaluation method of indicators [ 10 , 21 ], material quality evaluation method [ 20 , 22 ], value evaluation method [ 23 , 24 ], and other methods are used. At the national [ 9 , 25 ], provincial [ 26 ], municipal [ 27 ], county [ 10 , 28 ], village [ 29 , 30 ], and grid levels [ 31 ], the multi-functional evaluation and zoning of cultivated land are investigated using the methods of full arrangement polygons [ 32 ], spatial autocorrelation [ 33 ], coupling coordination degree modeling [ 5 , 34 ], and Spearman level correlation coefficients [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was defined as goods and services provided by different land use categories in order to meet the demands of human activities. Considerable progress had identified land use function from the aspects of production, living, and ecology, by establishing a comprehensive index system (Meng et al, 2022). Besides, some literatures measured the degree of human activities on land use (Howison et al, 2018;Yin et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2022), and captured the changes in fixed input or economic output efficiency per unit of land in a certain administrative region (Guo and Shen, 2015;Jiang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trade-off is generally described as the status where a specific system benefits at the cost of others (Hamilton et al, 2019). A wealth of studies investigated the links and interactions among multiple natural ecosystem services (Howe et al, 2014;Cord et al, 2017;Geng et al, 2022), and some scholars recently explored the trade-offs/synergies between natural and artificial ecosystems such as multiple land use functions (Fan et al, 2021;Zhu et al, 2021;Meng et al, 2022), but it is relatively scarce to quantify the trade-offs and synergies of different land use characteristics. To fill this research gap, this article focused on the relationships between land use dominant and recessive morphologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%