2020
DOI: 10.1117/1.jei.29.5.053003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial–temporal graph attention networks for skeleton-based action recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the Fourier transform usually assumes that the graph structure is fixed, in the frequency domain, it is difficult for the graph convolutional network to directly process the dynamic graph because the graph changes over time, and involves the eigenvalue decomposition of the matrix, resulting in high complex computation. Therefore, spatial domains-based graph convolutional network is usually used for action recognition [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the Fourier transform usually assumes that the graph structure is fixed, in the frequency domain, it is difficult for the graph convolutional network to directly process the dynamic graph because the graph changes over time, and involves the eigenvalue decomposition of the matrix, resulting in high complex computation. Therefore, spatial domains-based graph convolutional network is usually used for action recognition [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the manually defined topology is difficult to achieve the aggregation of nodes without physical connection, which greatly affects the recognition rate and generalization of the network. To obtain more connectivity relationships between the joints, and improve the expressive ability of the model, ST-GAT [21] defines the spatiotemporal adjacent nodes and aggregation functions of the root node through the attention mechanism. The AS-GCN [22] introduces an encoder-decoder structure to capture action-specific potential dependencies directly from the actions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) When designing graph convolution kernels, the strategy does not take into account the relationship between the number of kernels and the complexity of the graph structure. As a result, the topology of the network will be too smooth and will not be able to fully capture the distance between distant joints while the learning process is taking place [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering this problem, to achieve state-of-the-art performance, we propose the use of Graph Convolutional Neural Networks, and we create a novel gating mechanism applied to Semantic Graph Convolutions(SGCs) [15] named Semantic Graph Attention (SGAT). We enhance the analysis of global correlation, which is crucial for understanding human actions [16]. Our new layer can learn both channel-wise weights for edges, combine them with kernel matrices, and features inter-dependencies over channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%