Spatial-temporal dynamic evaluation of the ecosystem service value from the perspective of “production-living-ecological” spaces: A case study in Dongliao River Basin, China

Zhang, Jiquan; Li, Xiaoyü; Tong, Zhijun; Du, Walian; Zhang, Jiquan; Liu, Xingpeng; Liu, Mengshu

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130218

Cited by 61 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 80 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As a big strategic background, the MFZ carries the national will and transmits it to all kinds of planning, and finally guides the layout of PLES through the three-zones and three-lines [ 4 , 49 , 64 ]. The quantitative relationship and spatial layout of PLES are the application guidance of national strategy at the level of territorial space, and also the real appeal of the public for affluent life, efficient production, and ecological living conditions [ 5 , 34 , 67 , 68 ]. Meanwhile, it is also a response to the sustainable development goals of the United Nations [ 69 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China: Perspective of Main Function Zones

Chen

Pan

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main function zone (MFZ) is the major strategy of China’s economic development and ecological environment protection. Clarifying the logical relationship between “MFZ strategy” and “territorial spatial layout” is vital to construct regional economic layout and territorial spatial supporting system of high-quality development. However, few studies have revealed the evolution process and formation mechanism of the production-living-ecological space (PLES) structure of China’s MFZ over a long period of time. To bridge the gap, based on the land use dataset in China from 1980 to 2020, this study analyzed the evolution patterns of PLES in China’s MFZs using multiple methods and measured the formation mechanism of PLES in different types of MFZs with the GeoDetector model. Results showed that the spatial structure of China’s national territory has evolved drastically in the past 40 years, showing significant horizontal regional differentiation and vertical gradient differentiation. Ecological space has been continuously decreasing, while production space and living space have been continuously increasing, and the evolution of PLES varied significantly in different MFZs. During the study period, the gravity center of PLES in China all moved westward. The spatial distribution pattern of production space and living space was from northeast to southwest, and the ecological space was from east to west. The evolution of China’s territorial spatial structure was subject to the combined effects of natural and socio-economic factors, exhibiting significant differences in different MFZs. Land use intensity had the most prominent influence on the formation of PLES, followed by elevation. The influences of different factors on PLES structure were strengthened mainly through two types of nonlinear enhancement and dual-factor enhancement. This study can provide scientific support for the optimal management and high-quality development of territorial space in China.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China: Perspective of Main Function Zones

Chen

Pan

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The coupling coordination of PLES is an extension of the connotation of coordinating the man-land relationship and promoting sustainable development [ 2 , 10 , 11 ]. Previous studies on PLES mainly focused on PLES classification [ 15 ], index construction [ 2 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], pattern evolution [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], spatial conflict [ 4 , 5 ], spatial optimization [ 8 , 9 , 16 , 22 , 23 ], eco-environmental effect [ 6 , 24 , 25 ], and coupling coordination analysis [ 2 , 11 , 12 ]. Specifically, regarding the classification of PLES, previous scholars have completed abundant studies on land classification and evaluation systems based on different research perspectives [ 2 , 17 , 26 ].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The influence intensity of different factors on the change of the PLES spatial pattern is quantified, and it is pointed out that natural factors significantly limit territorial spatial patterns [ 1 , 33 ]. In terms of the eco-environmental effects of PLES, some studies combined the evolution characteristics of PLES with eco-environmental quality, quantified the eco-environmental effects brought by the evolution of PLES pattern, and clarified the impact of PLES transformation on eco-environmental quality [ 6 , 24 , 31 ]. In addition, previous literature based on the comprehensive perspective of PLES evaluated the function index of PLES and analyzed the coupling coordination of PLES by constructing the index system of PLES, providing ideas for optimizing the spatial layout of PLES [ 2 , 11 , 12 ].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The rapid advancement of urbanization has intensified the demand for production-living-ecological space (PLES). The conflict of PLES has led to a series of issues, including out-of-control space development, disordered regional competition, tightening resource and environmental constraints, a deteriorating human-capital relationship, and serious damage to the ecological environment [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Constructing a new pattern of territorial space development and protection, gradually forming a PLES with coordinated functions and a new pattern of territorial space development and protection with obvious main functions, complementary advantages, and high-quality development are effective ways to alleviate the multiple problems facing China’s territorial space utilization [ 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China

Cui

Chen

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Territorial space is a multi-functional complex. The coordinated production-living-ecological space (PLES) effectively coordinates the man-land relationship, promotes regional sustainable development, and maximizes territorial space. How to build a high-quality national spatial layout and support system for development has become a hot topic of concern in all sectors of society. However, few studies have explored the coupling coordination considering the various production-living-ecological functions of land use type and its influencing factors of PLES at the county scale in China. To address the gap, based on the connotation of PLES theory, this study established a classification and evaluation system for PLES and analyzed the spatio-temporal characteristics, coupling coordination degree, spatial autocorrelation, and influencing factors of PLES in China from 2000 to 2020. The results are as follows: (1) The production space index and living space index in China showed a continuous increase tendency, while the ecological space index decreased continuously during the study period. The production space and living space were concentrated in the east of Hu Line, and the ecological space indexes in mountainous areas were significantly higher than those in plain areas during the study period. (2) The gravity centers of PLES all migrated to the west of China to different degrees during the study period. (3) From 2000 to 2020, the basically balanced category was the main coupling coordination type, and the number of seriously unbalanced categories accounted for the least. In the west of the Hu Line, the seriously unbalanced category was dominant, while in the east of the Hu Line were the moderately unbalanced categories and above. (4) During the study period, the low-low type was the main relationship type, widely distributed in western China, followed by the high-high type, mainly situated in the North China Plain, Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, Jianghan Plain, Chengdu Plain, Northeast China Plain, and some provincial capital cities. (5) Regression results showed that natural factors were the main reason restricting the coordinated development of PLES, and socioeconomic factors could effectively promote the coordinated development of PLES. Landscape pattern also significantly influenced the coordinated development of PLES, but varied greatly. The findings of this study can provide a scientific reference for the optimization of territorial space layout and the promotion of high-quality development of territorial space.

show abstract

“…Land 2022, 11, 1000 2 of 20 Since Costanza (1997) [6] first proposed the concept of ESV, the related research on ESV has always been the major focus in geography and ecology [7,8]. At present, ESV can be assessed in three ways: by the monetary, physical, and energy forms.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatial-Temporal Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Value and Its Driving Mechanisms in China

Wei

Zhao

Cheng

et al. 2022

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding the spatial differentiation and driving mechanisms of ecosystem service value (ESV) is helpful for the protection and sustainable development of the ecological environment. Despite the fact that various studies on ESV have been conducted in various regions, few studies have discussed the spatial differentiation characteristics of ESV in a long time series at a national scale, and even fewer studies have thoroughly examined the driving mechanism of the spatial differentiation of ESV from the perspective of different regions. On the basis of China’s land use data from 1990 to 2018, this paper used the methods of land use dynamics, the ESV evaluation model, hot spot analysis, the barycenter model, and the geographical detector model to study the temporal and spatial differentiation characteristics of land use and ESV in the study area. Moreover, it analyzes the driving mechanisms of the spatial differentiation of ESV at the national scale and in different regions of China. Our results showed the following: (1) Other land types have increased overall, with the exception of grassland. Obvious differences were observed in the single land use dynamics of each land type, especially the construction land, where farmland was the primary source of construction land. With the passage of time, the dynamic degree of comprehensive land use increased. (2) During the study period, ESV generally showed a decreasing trend, with distinct characteristics in high and low ESV areas. The center of gravity of ESV was constantly in Dingxi County and Pingliang City, Shaanxi Province, and its trajectory was generally “S”-shaped. (3) From the perspective of national scale and different regions, the dominant factors affecting the spatial differentiation of ESV were different, and the interaction among multiple factors was significantly stronger than that of a single factor. The findings of the study can provide more scientific decision-making services for China in order to promote regional environmental protection and develop ecological civilization.

show abstract

Spatial-temporal dynamic evaluation of the ecosystem service value from the perspective of “production-living-ecological” spaces: A case study in Dongliao River Basin, China

Cited by 61 publications

References 80 publications

Evolution Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China: Perspective of Main Function Zones

Evolution Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China: Perspective of Main Function Zones

Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China

Spatial-Temporal Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Value and Its Driving Mechanisms in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About