Spatial-temporal change in urban agricultural land use efficiency from the perspective of agricultural multi-functionality: A case study of the Xi’an metropolitan zone

Abstract

The excessive expansion of urbanized areas has resulted in haphazard land utilization, immoderate consumption of superior agricultural land and water resources, significant fragmentation of agricultural landscape, and gradual deterioration of the agro-ecological environment. Combined, these factors cause poor land use efficiency. Under these circumstances, comprehensively assessing land use efficiency for urban agriculture is a key issue in land use research. Currently, evaluation methods for agricultural land use efficiency narrowly concentrate on aspects of economic input and output. However, urban agro-ecosystems can provide diverse economic, social, and ecological services and functions. In particular, the social and ecological services and functions originating from agricultural land, which have a higher value than economic services, play a significant role in ensuring regional social, ecological, and environmental security. However, recent research has rarely taken these benefits into consideration. Therefore, land use value has been greatly underestimated, which has resulted in mishandled and poor land use policies. In this study, we apply Landsat imagery and social and economic statistical data for the Xi'an metropolitan zone (XMZ) to investigate agricultural multi-functionality. We develop an evaluation framework for urban agricultural land use efficiency and identify agro-ecosystem services and functions as important outputs from agricultural land. The land use efficiency of urban agriculture is then evaluated using ecosystem services models, providing a mechanism for assessing spatial-temporal changes in land use efficiency in the XMZ from 1999 to 2015. Four important conclusions are reached from this analysis. First, the rapid urbanization and agricultural transformation from traditional cereal cultivation to modern urban agriculture has resulted in steadily increasing costs, outputs, and land use efficiency of urban agriculture. The total output value increased 41% and land use efficiency per hectare increased by 33.13% on average. Second, the spatial patterns of comprehensive output and land use efficiency were dominated by economic outputs from agricultural land. Areas near cities, which are dominated by orchard and arable land, provide Keywords: urban agriculture; land use efficiency; agro-ecosystem services; agricultural multi-functionality; Xi'an metropolitan zone (XMZ)

Urban lands for agricultural use: soft management of the ecology state

“…In the relations between the government agencies and horticultural non-profit partnerships, the application of soft management may include a number of actions. First of all, the municipal agencies at the base on scientific data, monitoring the state of ecosystems of suburban territories, would develop a perspective program for the development of this zone, considering its ecosystem functions [11,26]. Thus, a complex of socio-ecological systems (SES) based on the interaction of man and nature will be formed around the residential area of the city, which is the key to the sustainable use and conservation of nature [4,9].…”

Built‐up land expansion simulation with combination of naive Bayes and cellular automaton model—A case study of the Shanghai‐Hangzhou Bay agglomeration

“…In addition, policy variable‐permanent farmland is strongly related to the simulation of built‐up land. Typically, the most fertile and productive land is lost to built‐up land expansion, resulting in farmland loss (Martellozzo et al., 2015; Zhou & Li, 2017). Especially for those developed regions, people's demand for materials has increased the expansion of built‐up land.…”

Effect of Land Use/Cover Changes on Urban Cool Island Phenomenon in Seville, Spain

“…The agricultural land used for the cultivation of flowers, cereals and fruits does not fit with the normal spatial-temporal patterns of cultivation, but rather the requirements of the market. The differing cultivation on agricultural area and the varying phenology of vegetation in the area of urban green spaces causes seasonal variations in the spatial layout of vegetation that influence the spatial distribution of LST [96,97]. This is why there is no similar pattern of behavior between fraction of IS and mean LST alongside the rural urban gradient.…”