2002
DOI: 10.2307/1552472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Structure and Associations in a Pinus canariensis Population at the Treeline, Pico del Teide, Tenerife, Canary Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the strong relationship between altitude and spruce height, maximum spruce diameter was not related to this factor. This confirms the results of other studies in which diameter is not very sensitive to changes in elevation (Lieberman et al 1996;Barrera et al 2000;Paulsen et al 2000;Srutek et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the strong relationship between altitude and spruce height, maximum spruce diameter was not related to this factor. This confirms the results of other studies in which diameter is not very sensitive to changes in elevation (Lieberman et al 1996;Barrera et al 2000;Paulsen et al 2000;Srutek et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We hypothesized that (1) stand structure and tree morphology change with altitude due to pronounced climate variation, (2) the amount of deadwood (a) increases with altitude as the rate of decomposition decreases with climate cooling (Kueppers et al 2004) or (b) decreases in altitude as it is directly related to the site productivity and stand biomass (Siitonen 2001;Nilsson et al 2002) that decreases with elevation, (3) Picea abies regeneration decreases with altitude as demands of young spruces for light increases in the altitudinal gradient (Pisek and Winkler 1959). Some of the above relationships have already been examined (Myczkowski 1964;Vacek 1982;Wojterski et al 1982;Vacek and Podra´zsky´1998;Srutek et al 2002). The small numbers of measured stands was an important deficiency of these studies and this could bias the spatial patterns revealed in the studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this intense fire had burned all natural pine stands in the north and north-west of Tenerife, from the lower limit at the transition zone with the laurel forest at 600 m to the upper timber line at 2,000 m, and the closest unburned stands in the north of Tenerife consisted of pine plantations, no control plots could be found for comparison. Nevertheless, Srutek et al (2002) described natural regeneration of pine stands at the tree line above 1,700 m near the study area that may be comparable to our results.…”
Section: Sampling Designsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Very low sapling densities (0.014 ind./m 2 ) in post-fire regeneration were reported for a pine plantation (Arévalo et al 2001), probably due to low seed and cone production. Seedling/sapling densities (individual height B 10 cm) in unburned natural stands at the tree line in the north-west of Tenerife were also reported to be rather low (0.34 ind./m 2 , Srutek et al 2002). With respect to Mediterranean pine forests, several studies deal with fire severity and early post-fire regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation