2004
DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585-41.6.1143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Statistical Analysis of Adult Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) Counts: An Example Using Light Trap Data, in Redland Shire, Southeastern Queensland, Australia

Abstract: Many mosquito control agencies use carbon dioxide-baited traps as surveillance tools for adult vector populations. However, decisions regarding the number and location of trap sites and the frequency of collections are often based on logistical issues, and not on the bionomics or spatial distribution of the target species. Therefore, with the aim of providing practical information for adult mosquito surveillance programs, we used an array of 81 carbon dioxide- and octenol-baited lights traps to obtain weekly s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
37
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Estate boundaries were unavailable so we examined whether such autocorrelation occurs, and over what scale, by first fitting a non-spatial GLM with response and explanatory variables as described above, normal errors and identity link. We examined spatial autocorrelation in the residuals using Moran's I in SAS 9.4 (SAS, 2012), at increasing increments of 1-km lags between squares, to identify at what scale Moran's declined to 0.1, when spatial autocorrelation effects in model residuals are unlikely to compromise inference (Ryan et al, 2004;Kraan et al, 2009). This occurred at a 20-km lag and we created a factor grouping squares within 20 × 20-km blocks along OS grid lines.…”
Section: Spatial Correlation Between Burning and Environmental Correlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estate boundaries were unavailable so we examined whether such autocorrelation occurs, and over what scale, by first fitting a non-spatial GLM with response and explanatory variables as described above, normal errors and identity link. We examined spatial autocorrelation in the residuals using Moran's I in SAS 9.4 (SAS, 2012), at increasing increments of 1-km lags between squares, to identify at what scale Moran's declined to 0.1, when spatial autocorrelation effects in model residuals are unlikely to compromise inference (Ryan et al, 2004;Kraan et al, 2009). This occurred at a 20-km lag and we created a factor grouping squares within 20 × 20-km blocks along OS grid lines.…”
Section: Spatial Correlation Between Burning and Environmental Correlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpolation techniques such as kriging have been used to model the distribution of mosquitoes (Jeffery et al 2002, Ryan et al 2004, and agricultural pests (Cocu et al 2005, Nansen et al 2003. These modeling approaches depend on the presence of spatial autocorrelation, which is the degree of interdependence between values of a variable at different geographic scales.…”
Section: Introduction Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kriging interpolation methods were used in different studies of mosquito distribution (e.g., Ryan et al 2004, Richards et al 2006, Albieri et al 2010, Carrieri et al 2011. Interpolated values based on measured mean egg from 35 trap sites were showed on the maps (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%