1996
DOI: 10.1080/01638539609544948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial situation models and narrative understanding: Some generalizations and extensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
56
1
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
56
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar distance effects occur when subjects learn spatial arrangements of rooms and objects from detailed verbal descriptions. Relying exclusively on verbal descriptions, our subjects memorized a rectangular preschool with five rooms (Rinck et al 1996). Each room had two doors leading to adjacent rooms and a third door opening into a common inner courtyard.…”
Section: Learning a Spatial Layout From A Verbal Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar distance effects occur when subjects learn spatial arrangements of rooms and objects from detailed verbal descriptions. Relying exclusively on verbal descriptions, our subjects memorized a rectangular preschool with five rooms (Rinck et al 1996). Each room had two doors leading to adjacent rooms and a third door opening into a common inner courtyard.…”
Section: Learning a Spatial Layout From A Verbal Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, spatial distance from focus affects accessibility of objects in memory; known objects spatially close to the protagonist become more primed and accessible in memory than spatially distant objects. This effect has been referred to as the spatial gradient ofaccessibility or spatial distance effect, and it has been demonstrated repeatedly (see, e.g., Morrow, Bower,& Greenspan, 1989;Morrow, Greenspan, & Bower, 1987;Rinck & Bower, 1995;Rinck, Hahnel, Bower, & Glowalla, 1997;Rinck, Williams, Bower, & Becker, 1996; Wilson, Rinck, McNamara, Bower, & Morrow, 1993).Most experiments that have revealed an effect of spatial distance on accessibility have followed the procedure introduced by Morrow et al (1989) or a version of the paradigm developed by Rinck and Bower (1995). Participants first memorize the layout of a building with many rooms, each containing a number of critical objects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, spatial distance from focus affects accessibility of objects in memory; known objects spatially close to the protagonist become more primed and accessible in memory than spatially distant objects. This effect has been referred to as the spatial gradient ofaccessibility or spatial distance effect, and it has been demonstrated repeatedly (see, e.g., Morrow, Bower,& Greenspan, 1989;Morrow, Greenspan, & Bower, 1987;Rinck & Bower, 1995;Rinck, Hahnel, Bower, & Glowalla, 1997;Rinck, Williams, Bower, & Becker, 1996; Wilson, Rinck, McNamara, Bower, & Morrow, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spatial gradient occurs regularly, even when the memory organization may be more temporal than spatial (Curiel & Radvansky, 2002) or when the story protagonist is not actually moving, but is only thinking about traveling through the building (Rinck, Williams, Bower, & Becker, 1996). Furthermore, this effect is governed by the number of rooms that are traversed rather than a reflection of Euclidean distance (Rinck & Denis, 2004;Rinck, Hähnel, Bower, & Glowalla, 1997).…”
Section: Spatial Gradient Of Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spatial gradient of availability is more prominent when the movement is in a continuous, expected direction, as compared to when the movement from room to room is more random (e.g., jumping from room to room via security cameras) (Dutke & Rinck, 2006;Rapp et al, 2006). Finally, the reader needs to have extensive knowledge of the spatial layout prior to reading, through either memorizing a map or reading a spatial description of the environment that associates the objects with the rooms that they are in prior to reading the narratives (Haenggi, Kintsch, & Gernsbacher, 1995;Rinck et al, 1996). Without such knowledge, the spatial gradient is not observed (Zwaan, Radvansky, Hilliard, & Curiel, 1998).…”
Section: Spatial Gradient Of Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%