2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-950x(2005)131:6(277)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Significant Wave Height Variation Assessment and Its Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stations are located at depths ranging from 47 m to 4599 m. In the study area, while larger significant wave heights appear in the winter season, relatively smaller waves occur in the summer season. The annual spatial average significant wave height at the study area is 2.31 m. Previously, Altunkaynak (2005) and Altunkaynak and Ozger (2005) applied the TPCSV and PCSV techniques do determine significant wave height using data from the same stations. The same data were used in the method developed in this study, i.e., SPCSV.…”
Section: Data Used and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stations are located at depths ranging from 47 m to 4599 m. In the study area, while larger significant wave heights appear in the winter season, relatively smaller waves occur in the summer season. The annual spatial average significant wave height at the study area is 2.31 m. Previously, Altunkaynak (2005) and Altunkaynak and Ozger (2005) applied the TPCSV and PCSV techniques do determine significant wave height using data from the same stations. The same data were used in the method developed in this study, i.e., SPCSV.…”
Section: Data Used and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sen and Habib (1998) developed the standard areal dependency approach to make point and spatial estimations of a variable. Later, Altunkaynak and Ozger (2005) used PCSV to predict significant wave height. In the PCSV approach, it is assumed that the highest correlation exists between the pivot station and the closest station to the pivot station, and the lowest correlation exists between the pivot station and the farthest station from the pivot station.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Kriging is one of the most developed regional prediction method, it fails to define the influence radius which delineate the borders of the contribution areas. Kriging method has been applied to mining (Matius et al, 2004), tunnel (Öztürk and Nasuf, 2002), hydrology (Altunkaynak et al, 2003;Ş en and Habib, 1998), hydraulics and ocean engineering (Altunkaynak, 2005;Altunkaynak andÖzger, 2005). This approach is also often used in geostatistics to determine the parameters of regional variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%