2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial, seasonal and ontogenetic variation in diet of Northeast Arctic Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides )

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Smaller individuals are found further off the bottom, and pelagic activity is greatest during early autumn (Vollen & Albert 2008). Prey species depends largely on availability, and diet may therefore vary depending on habitat and season, as well as fish size (Smidt 1969;Hovde et al 2002;Vollen et al 2004;Woll & Gundersen 2004;Simonsen et al 2006). Greenland halibut is a slow-growing predator that may reach a length of 1.2 m and a weight of 25 kg; however, Greenland halibut caught in Norwegian waters seldom reaches 10 kg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller individuals are found further off the bottom, and pelagic activity is greatest during early autumn (Vollen & Albert 2008). Prey species depends largely on availability, and diet may therefore vary depending on habitat and season, as well as fish size (Smidt 1969;Hovde et al 2002;Vollen et al 2004;Woll & Gundersen 2004;Simonsen et al 2006). Greenland halibut is a slow-growing predator that may reach a length of 1.2 m and a weight of 25 kg; however, Greenland halibut caught in Norwegian waters seldom reaches 10 kg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of feeding activities and factors influencing them is thus critically important in our understanding of the dynamics of fish populations. Much effort has been put on the studies of fish prey compositions that show fish feeding characteristics and analyze habitat environments and inter-and intra-species trophic interactions (Shaw & Jenkins, 1992;Hovde et al, 2002;Martins et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Islam et al (2006) found that a single species dietary habit at the upper river in Chikugo estuary for Japanese temperate bass and a multi-species dietary habit were dominated by the common coastal copepods in the lower estuary. Spatial variations in the abundance of some major prey species could cause regional differences in diet composition, and such information can lead us to a better understanding of the ecology and feeding habits of the predator in question (Hovde et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding trophic interactions is central to fully understanding a species biology, population dynamics, how fishing effects productivity and how changes in relative abundance or population structure may influence the ecosystem. It is of interest to identify the environmental factors that may influence trophic relationships as these, along with ontogeny, largely determine the content and stability of fish diets (Wootton 1992;Hovde et al 2002;Jaworski & Ragnarsson 2006;Byron & Link 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%