1989
DOI: 10.2307/2389612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Scaling in Ecology

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. British Ecological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Functional Ecology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

53
3,038
4
67

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,014 publications
(3,242 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
53
3,038
4
67
Order By: Relevance
“…The hierarchical approach presented here can be considered as 'middle out', in contrast to the conventional 'top-down' or 'bottom-up' approaches that tend to be polarised either towards reductionism or holism (Wu and Loucks, 1995). Clearly, though there is no single correct scale or level for observations and ultimately, the appropriate scales will depend on the questions asked, the organisms studied and the time period considered (Wiens, 1989). Studies conducted over several scales, however, will integrate scale-dependent relationships into a more ecologically meaningful investigation of animal-habitat relationships.…”
Section: Spatial Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hierarchical approach presented here can be considered as 'middle out', in contrast to the conventional 'top-down' or 'bottom-up' approaches that tend to be polarised either towards reductionism or holism (Wu and Loucks, 1995). Clearly, though there is no single correct scale or level for observations and ultimately, the appropriate scales will depend on the questions asked, the organisms studied and the time period considered (Wiens, 1989). Studies conducted over several scales, however, will integrate scale-dependent relationships into a more ecologically meaningful investigation of animal-habitat relationships.…”
Section: Spatial Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hierarchical embeddedness, to be conceived as a function of scale, enables researchers to identify discontinuities that mark the systemic boundaries between conceptual wholes in a (discrete) hierarchy. The scale of interest demarcates a subset of the continuous function, thus sometimes also referred to as the domain of scale (Wiens, 1989). This scale (domain) can be expressed mathematically by applying the concept of a filter, as the “period of time or space over which signals are integrated [
] to give message” (Allen & Starr, 1982, p. 18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These topographically induced behavioural differences are likely to affect the quantity and quality of pup provisioning by mothers and influence individual pupping site selection. Less costly sites are likely to be colonised preferentially and by larger, older and more dominant females, potentially generating fine scale spatial heterogeneity in female quality within the breeding colony.Whilst it may be obvious that topography is likely to impact significantly on an individual animal's behaviour (Stamps 1995) topography is quantified at a spatial grain relevant to the behaviours being studied, that is, at a resolution whereby topographic features will actually impact upon individuals' decision making processes (Forman & Gordon 1986;Turner et al 1989;Wiens 1989). Very few studies have achieved both these aims (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%