2007
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2007.898068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Resolution Assessment of Nano-SQUIDs Made by Focused Ion Beam

Abstract: The ability to reduce SQUID dimensions into the submicrometer or nanometer regime points the way towards novel applications, particularly in emerging fields such as quantum information processing, single-photon/particle detection, and experimental studies of nano-scale entities such as Bose-Einstein condensates. We report here on our ongoing work combining traditional thin-film and photolithographic fabrication processes with computer-aided-design software and focused ion beam milling to realize sub-micrometer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 For a circular loop, such increasing can be approximately evaluated as A eff = A g ͕͓1+⌳͑T͒ / a͔͖ 2 , where ⌳͑T͒ = 2 ͑T͒ / d is the two-dimensional Pearl screening length, ͑T͒ is the London penetration depth at the temperature T, d is the superconducting film thickness, and A g is the geometrical area of the SQUID loop. With typical values of loop radius and film thickness employed in nano-SQUID fabrication, the correction factor, in general, cannot be neglected.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 For a circular loop, such increasing can be approximately evaluated as A eff = A g ͕͓1+⌳͑T͒ / a͔͖ 2 , where ⌳͑T͒ = 2 ͑T͒ / d is the two-dimensional Pearl screening length, ͑T͒ is the London penetration depth at the temperature T, d is the superconducting film thickness, and A g is the geometrical area of the SQUID loop. With typical values of loop radius and film thickness employed in nano-SQUID fabrication, the correction factor, in general, cannot be neglected.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the filamentary model does not consider flux focusing due to finite width of the superconducting tracks [110,145]. For a circular loop, such increasing can be approximately evaluated as A eff =Α g [(1+Λ(T)/a)] 2 where Λ(T)=λ 2 (T)/d is the two-dimensional effective penetration depths [146], λ(T) is the London penetration depth at the temperature T, d is the superconducting film thickness and A g is the geometrical area of the SQUID loop. With typical values of loop radius and film thickness employed in nano-SQUID fabrication, the correction factor may not be negligible.…”
Section: Flux Coupling and Spin Sensitivity Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated value of the M obtained integrating the magnetic field produced by the coil over the geometrical area of the SQUID is about half the value of the experimental one indicating an effective area greater than the geometrical one. Probably, it is due to the Pearl penetration length which increases the flux capture area [11]. In fact for a circular loop (radius a) consisting of a thin superconductor film (thickness d) the effective area is: [11] where is the two-dimensional Pearls screening length and is the London penetration depth.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, it is due to the Pearl penetration length which increases the flux capture area [11]. In fact for a circular loop (radius a) consisting of a thin superconductor film (thickness d) the effective area is: [11] where is the two-dimensional Pearls screening length and is the London penetration depth. With typical values of loop radius and film thickness employed in nano-SQUIDs fabrication, the correction factor cannot be neglected.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%