2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect

Abstract: Through the preferential pairing of response positions to pitch, here we show that the internal representation of pitch height is spatial in nature and affects performance, especially in musically trained participants, when response alternatives are either vertically or horizontally aligned. The finding that our cognitive system maps pitch height onto an internal representation of space, which in turn affects motor performance even when this perceptual attribute is irrelevant to the task, extends previous stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

71
510
7
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 443 publications
(590 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
71
510
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in our study also go further in terms of explaining the origin of the spatial mapping of pitch which underlies a well-documented series of effects (e.g. Evans & Treisman, 2010;Patching & Quinlan, 2002;Rusconi et al, 2006). They challenge the idea of a general, amodal spatial representation of pitch shared across all modalities, along with other spatial representations of magnitudes (e.g.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained in our study also go further in terms of explaining the origin of the spatial mapping of pitch which underlies a well-documented series of effects (e.g. Evans & Treisman, 2010;Patching & Quinlan, 2002;Rusconi et al, 2006). They challenge the idea of a general, amodal spatial representation of pitch shared across all modalities, along with other spatial representations of magnitudes (e.g.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In most cases, the spatial mapping of pitch has been assessed in reference to the location of visual targets or the direction of visual movement (see Occelli et al, 2009, for an exception and a review). In stimulusresponse compatibility effects in which participants are shown to be faster at responding to a high pitch sound with the upper key rather than the lower one (Rusconi et al, 2006), vision might also play a role as participants can perceive or imagine the visual organisation of the two response buttons. In the study reported here, we investigated whether the spatial mapping of pitch was intimately tied to vision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A slightly different prediction can be made, based on the SMARC effect. As said before, when performing a timber identification task of sounds with different pitches, musicians are faster on low-pitched tones when pressing a key to their left and on high-pitched tones when pressing a key to their right (Rusconi et al 2006;Lidji et al, 2007). If this is true, in our experiment both pianists and non-pianist musicians should show association between right-hand responses and high-pitched sounds and left-hand responses and low-pitched sounds.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…In fact, when performing a timber identification task of sounds with different pitches, musicians are faster on low-pitched tones when pressing a left-side key and on high-pitched tones when pressing a right-side key (Rusconi et al 2006;Lidji et al, 2007). This phenomenon has been called the Spatial Musical Association of Response Code (SMARC) effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%