1987
DOI: 10.2307/3801004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Relations between Sympatric Coyotes and Red Foxes in North Dakota

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
2
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
59
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that importance of human structures in the contemporary Sacramento Valley landscape relates to predation refuges from coyotes, a larger, sympatric, and competitively dominant canid. Coyotes compete with red foxes both through exploitation and interference and are known to be important determinants of red fox distribution and abundance in other parts of their range (Dekker 1983;Sargeant et al 1987;Sargeant and Allen 1989;Gosselink et al 2003;Van Etten et al 2007;Levi and Wilmers 2012). Nevertheless, we developed a model excluding proximity to human development specifically so that future surveys can be stratified in terms of areas where both models predict occurrence vs. where the two-variable but not the full model predicts occurrence, enabling independent, unbiased assessment of the relationship of human development to fox occurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We hypothesize that importance of human structures in the contemporary Sacramento Valley landscape relates to predation refuges from coyotes, a larger, sympatric, and competitively dominant canid. Coyotes compete with red foxes both through exploitation and interference and are known to be important determinants of red fox distribution and abundance in other parts of their range (Dekker 1983;Sargeant et al 1987;Sargeant and Allen 1989;Gosselink et al 2003;Van Etten et al 2007;Levi and Wilmers 2012). Nevertheless, we developed a model excluding proximity to human development specifically so that future surveys can be stratified in terms of areas where both models predict occurrence vs. where the two-variable but not the full model predicts occurrence, enabling independent, unbiased assessment of the relationship of human development to fox occurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of studies of red foxes in landscapes similar to modern-day Sacramento Valley, we anticipated that proximity to human development conferred protection against coyotes (Dekker 1983;Sargeant et al 1987;Sargeant and Allen 1989;Gosselink et al 2003). We used ArcGIS (v10.0; Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA) to project locations of red fox den sites, road kills, and 34,500 randomly generated points (i.e., a density of~three points per square kilometer) and coded them with respect to the three explanatory variables: 1) vegetation class, 2) distance to grasslands (DistGrass), and 3) distance to development (DistDev).…”
Section: Data Coding In Gismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…É um animal territorial que está compartilhando sua área de vida com outros predadores, uma coexistência que pode estar se dando pela segregação alimentar espacial e temporal (BOTHMA et al, 1984;SARGEANT et al, 1987).…”
Section: A Composição Dos Carnívoros Do Parque Nacional Dos Aparados unclassified
“…), and thus reduce the overall risk of wildlife strikes by aircraft (R. Dolbeer, United States Department of Agriculture, personal communication; S. Loutitt, personal communication). Coyotes are known to predate on Red Fox in some southern regions (Voigt and Earle 1983;Sargeant et al 1987;Harrison et al 1989), although fox predation by Coyotes has not yet been reported at the Yellowknife airport. There are few site-specific wildlife studies that address relative abundance and spatial patterns of wildlife at airports (Hoffman et al 1996;Dolbeer et al 2000).…”
Section: Air-strike Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%