2019
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2019.1646631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial reasoning as a syntactic method for programming socio-spatial parametric grammar for vertical residential buildings

Abstract: Integrating social constraints in computational models remains a challenge due to the difficulties in representing them algorithmically. Different methods, such as shape grammar and space syntax, consider the morphology of the overall form and its components. This research aims to find a mechanism for combining both methods for exploring spatial-formal features that affect the social life in vernacular houses in the Middle East and North Africa region. A developed model of 'spatial reasoning' analysis, embedde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next step, using the rotated component matrix table, the number of extracted categories and the concepts that de ne each of these factors could be discovered (Table 3). Consequently, the boundary commonalities in houses number 38,33,35,39,43,42,34,32,44,45,37,31,40,30,29,17 and 41 de ne the rst category. Houses number 28,26,22,27,20,18,19,16,23,25,24, and 21 are the second category, houses number 9, 5, 11, 15, 14, 1, 13, 3, 8, 7, 4 and 12 form the third category and houses 10 and 2 form the fourth category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the next step, using the rotated component matrix table, the number of extracted categories and the concepts that de ne each of these factors could be discovered (Table 3). Consequently, the boundary commonalities in houses number 38,33,35,39,43,42,34,32,44,45,37,31,40,30,29,17 and 41 de ne the rst category. Houses number 28,26,22,27,20,18,19,16,23,25,24, and 21 are the second category, houses number 9, 5, 11, 15, 14, 1, 13, 3, 8, 7, 4 and 12 form the third category and houses 10 and 2 form the fourth category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Rhinoceros software and Grasshopper plugin, based on user input data, various spatial properties are accurately measured through mathematical algorithms and the effect of spatial con guration on the behavioral pattern of individuals is determined [26]. In recent years, studies investigated the syntax of residential spaces using this new method with the help of the Grasshopper plugin, which calculated the level of integration, control, choice, and entropy of spatial features such as privacy, spatial hierarchy, access, and order [27][28][29]. In this study, the typology of houses in the coastal city of Bushehr was discovered by combining the output of spatial analysis in Rhino and Depth Map, analysis of house structure, and factor analysis of the obtained data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next step, using the rotated component matrix table, the number of extracted categories and the concepts that define each of these factors could be discovered (Table 4). Consequently, the boundary commonalities in houses number 38,33,35,39,43,42,34,32,44,45,37,31,40,30,29,17 and 41 define the first category. Houses number 28,26,22,27,20,18,19,16,23,25,24, and 21 are the second category, houses number 9, 5, 11, 15, 14, 1, 13, 3, 8, 7, 4 and 12 form the third category and houses 10 and 2 form the fourth category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Rhinoceros software and Grasshopper plugin, based on user input data, various spatial properties are accurately measured through mathematical algorithms and the effect of spatial configuration on the behavioral pattern of individuals is determined [26]. In recent years, studies investigated the syntax of residential spaces using this new method with the help of the Grasshopper plugin, which calculated the level of integration, control, choice, and entropy of spatial features such as privacy, spatial hierarchy, access, and order [27][28][29]. In this study, the typology of houses in the coastal city of Bushehr was discovered by combining the output of spatial analysis in Rhino and Depth Map, analysis of house structure, and factor analysis of the obtained data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attributed adjacency graphs (also referred to as layout graphs/bubble diagrams/semantic building fingerprints in literature) can embed architectural information with multiple attributes, with nodes denoting different features of spaces and edges denoting various types of connections between spaces, which can be useful for numerous design tasks such as spatial analysis and reasoning (Al-Jokhadar & Jabi, 2020). Meanwhile, recent years have witnessed the surge of machine learning-based architectural design research (As et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%