Spatial Preference Heterogeneity for Integrated River Basin Management: The Case of the Shiyang River Basin, China

Abstract

Integrated river basin management (IRBM) programs have been launched in most parts of China to ease escalating environmental degradation. Meanwhile, little is known about the benefits from and the support for these programs. This paper presents a case study of the preference heterogeneity for IRBM in the Shiyang River Basin, China, as measured by the Willingness to Pay (WTP), for a set of major restoration attributes. A discrete choice analysis of relevant restoration attributes was conducted. The results based on a sample of 1012 households in the whole basin show that, on average, there is significant support for integrated ecological restoration as indicated by significant WTP for all ecological attributes. However, residential location induced preference heterogeneities are prevalent. Generally, compared to upper-basin residents, middle sub-basin residents have lower mean WTP while lower sub-basin residents express higher mean WTP. The disparity in utility is partially explained by the difference in ecological and socio-economic status of the residents. In conclusion, estimating welfare benefit of IRBM projects based on sample responses from a specific sub-section of the basin only may either understate or overstate the welfare estimate.

Public Preferences for the Design of a Farmland Retirement Project: Using Choice Experiments in Urban and Rural Areas of Wuwei, China

“…Wuwei has been a major source of the country's sandstorms, and 39% of its area covered by the Tengger Desert, the Badain Jaran Desert, and the vast Gobi Desertland [27,28]. At the same time, the population density in Wuwei is 375 persons/km 2 , which is the highest of China's inland basins [29]. Unsustainable depletion of water and soil resources for satisfying the demand on agriculture has resulted in serious ecological crises, such as groundwater decline, land degradation, and a loss of biodiversity [30].…”

Optimal Use of Agricultural Water and Land Resources through Reconfiguring Crop Planting Structure under Socioeconomic and Ecological Objectives

“…This has led to increasing water supply-demand contradictions among multiple Water 2017, 9, 488 6 of 17 users. Agricultural water used to account for over 90% of the total water use in the early 2000s, leaving virtually nothing for environment health and ecosystem services [1,7]. Moreover, the cropping structure was unreasonable.…”

“…Soaring population has led to an ever-increasing demand for food and farmland expansion, which are hard to be supported by physically limited natural resources. Among the water-consuming sectors, agriculture accounts for 70% of the total water use worldwide [1]. In semi-arid and arid areas which heavily rely on irrigated agriculture, the role of agricultural water is even more critical.…”

An Overview of Drainage and Salinization Problems of Irrigated Lands

“…Although 70% of the earth is covered by water (US Geological Survey, 2012), only a small part (2.5%) is available as fresh water and the remaining share (97.5%) is available as salt water in the oceans (Gupta, 1992;Singh, 2015a). Irrigated agriculture is by far the largest water user at a global scale (Fasakhodi et al, 2010), consuming over 70% of the world's developed water resources (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2013; Singh, 2014;Aregay et al, 2016). About 98.7% of all liquid fresh water is stored as groundwater, while only 0.98% exists in rivers and lakes (Bouwer, 2000).…”

“…About 98.7% of all liquid fresh water is stored as groundwater, while only 0.98% exists in rivers and lakes (Bouwer, 2000). Irrigated agriculture is by far the largest water user at a global scale (Fasakhodi et al, 2010), consuming over 70% of the world's developed water resources (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2013; Singh, 2014;Aregay et al, 2016).…”