2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial prediction of soil sand content at various sampling density based on geostatistical and machine learning algorithms in plain areas

Lili Qu,
Huizhong Lu,
Zhiyuan Tian
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, altitude can influence sediment deposition and erosion, as higher areas may experience different patterns of precipitation and erosion. Mello et al (2022) corroborated the importance of topographic attributes linked to hydrological behavior in mapping sand and silt content, while Qu et al (2024) demonstrated the relevance of other topographic indices for obtaining more accurate maps of sand content spatial distribution. These findings underscore the need to consider a variety of topographic attributes for precise and detailed prediction of sediment distribution in the soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…On the other hand, altitude can influence sediment deposition and erosion, as higher areas may experience different patterns of precipitation and erosion. Mello et al (2022) corroborated the importance of topographic attributes linked to hydrological behavior in mapping sand and silt content, while Qu et al (2024) demonstrated the relevance of other topographic indices for obtaining more accurate maps of sand content spatial distribution. These findings underscore the need to consider a variety of topographic attributes for precise and detailed prediction of sediment distribution in the soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Despite these limitations, geological data could be used to help improve predictions in areas with lower data coverage, or higher uncertainty, via co-kriging, which allows relationships with additional variables to be used during the interpolation process 150,151 . Alternatively, a range of machine learning approaches are available which are also able to use additional information, such as geological data and other environmental covariates; these methods can perform better than traditional geostatistical methods for generating spatial interpolations 152,153 , particularly when the density of data points for the primary variable of interest is low 154 . However, they do not always generate more accurate interpolations; a combined approach, which uses an ensemble of outputs from different interpolation methods with spatially-varying weightings dependant on density of available data, may result in better overall accuracy 136 .…”
Section: Usage Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values suggest a relatively robust model, particularly for SOC, where the PIR is lower than 0.50. Dvorakova et al (2023) [87] report a higher PIR of 0.88 for SOC prediction using Sentinel-2 data in Belgium and the Netherlands, while Qu et al (2024) [88] found a PIR of about 0.50 for predicting sand content in eastern China using digital soil mapping techniques. It should be noted, however, that the scientific community is still not decided on which is the best uncertainty measure in digital soil mapping.…”
Section: General Overview and Comparison With Other Work And Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%