2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial phylogenetics of butterflies in relation to environmental drivers and angiosperm diversity across North America

Abstract: Broad-scale, quantitative assessments of insect biodiversity and the factors shaping it remain particularly poorly explored. Here we undertook a spatial phylogenetic analysis of North American butterflies to test whether climate stability and temperature gradients have shaped their diversity and endemism. We also performed the first quantitative comparisons of spatial phylogenetic patterns between butterflies and flowering plants. We expected concordance between the two groups based on shared historical enviro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar distributions have been recorded in other aquatic insects, including stoneflies (Plecoptera) and caddisflies (Trichoptera), in which two clearly distinct components within the Nearctic fauna are observed: one in the east and one in the west [66][67][68]. The pattern is the opposite for butterflies and bumblebees, which do not depend on aquatic habitats and have the highest species richness in the western Nearctic [36,69], a mountainous region where plant diversity is also the highest [70].…”
Section: General Diversity Patternssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar distributions have been recorded in other aquatic insects, including stoneflies (Plecoptera) and caddisflies (Trichoptera), in which two clearly distinct components within the Nearctic fauna are observed: one in the east and one in the west [66][67][68]. The pattern is the opposite for butterflies and bumblebees, which do not depend on aquatic habitats and have the highest species richness in the western Nearctic [36,69], a mountainous region where plant diversity is also the highest [70].…”
Section: General Diversity Patternssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…While we only included species from the Nearctic, occurrences for those species with ranges outside the realm were included in our downstream modeling steps. Full species ranges are particularly critical for appropriately determining endemism and conservation status [36].…”
Section: Species Occurrence Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques are generally based on variance analysis and linear regression models for estimating the correlation between input (independent) and output (dependent) variables. Although these approaches are highly effective, lack of efficacy of complex and nonlinear inputs ( Hesami and Jones, 2021 ; Earl et al, 2021 ) and high probability ( Abbasi et al, 2016 ; Jamshidi et al, 2016 ; Farhadi et al, 2020 ) are the major concerns in plant tissue culture studies due to the sensitivity. These types of issues can be overcome by modern high throughput technologies like machine learning (ML) and artificial neural network (ANN) models for testing and optimizing the output variables concerning the input parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species range map data were derived from published field guides on North American butterfly species, including The Kaufman Field Guide to Butterflies of North America (Brock & Kaufman 2006) and A Swift Guide to Butterflies of Mexico and Central America (Glassberg 2018). The range maps were digitized as part of work by Earl et al (2021) and were re-used here. Range-wide average annual temperature and precipitation traits were extracted from each species' range averaging conditions over each polygon using the WorldClim2/BioClim dataset (representing average climatic conditions from 1970-2000) (Fick & Hijmans, 2017).…”
Section: Species Range Trait Phylogeny and Occurrence Datamentioning
confidence: 99%