2011
DOI: 10.1177/1071181311551262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Perception and Robot Operation: Should Spatial Abilities Be Considered When Selecting Robot Operators?

Abstract: Introduction. This study investigated the relationship between spatial perception abilities and robot operation under direct-line-of-sight and teleoperation viewing conditions. This study was an effort to determine if spatial ability testing may be a useful tool in the selection of human-robot interaction (HRI) operators. Method. Participants completed eight cognitive measures and operated one of four types of robots under tasks of low and high difficulty. Performance for each participant was tested during bot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RT, spatial abilities (SO & V), WM, dexterity (GD & FD), visual acuity (SV & WV) were all important factors for ToT; RT and V were important factors to the NoM; while WM, FD, and DP were all found to be important human factors to the NoM/min. These findings consolidate prior work that indicated spatial ability [80]- [81], WM [86], RT [86]- [87], and visual processing ability [25] were all important to both using a robot and performing manual reaching tasks. Additionally, it was found that both GD and FD also predicted the completion of the experimental tasks.…”
Section: Devicessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RT, spatial abilities (SO & V), WM, dexterity (GD & FD), visual acuity (SV & WV) were all important factors for ToT; RT and V were important factors to the NoM; while WM, FD, and DP were all found to be important human factors to the NoM/min. These findings consolidate prior work that indicated spatial ability [80]- [81], WM [86], RT [86]- [87], and visual processing ability [25] were all important to both using a robot and performing manual reaching tasks. Additionally, it was found that both GD and FD also predicted the completion of the experimental tasks.…”
Section: Devicessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Next, the third factor, spatial ability, is comprised of two components: spatial orientation based on an observer's point-of-view, and secondly, spatial visualization, viewpoint agnostic mental manipulation in a three-dimensional space. This factor is an important factor of HRI because it allows the user to create cognitive maps the workspace in order to make spatial decisions [80,81]. For example, this may assist with integrating information from multiple camera angles, and their direct line of sight viewpoint.…”
Section: Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human performance in robot teleoperation is indeed strongly related to both spatial skills and gaming experience. Notably, in robotic teleoperation via desktop [5], people with higher spatial abilities outperformed those with lower spatial abilities. At the same time, those with low spatial abilities but high gaming experience were able to complete the task nearly as fast as those with higher spatial abilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Another critical factor potentially affecting performance in HRIs is the experience with video games. Gamers are known to benefit from their gaming practice for their increased spatial abilities [3,4], handiness with joysticks and visual interfaces and, in turn, teleoperations [5,6,7]. Human performance in robot teleoperation is indeed strongly related to both spatial skills and gaming experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation