2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2004.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial patterns of sex offenders: Theoretical, empirical, and practical issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
75
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
75
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The offenders' environmental and site selection decision can then be seen as the reflection of their own knowledge and experience of the environment. This knowledge, as suggested previously, can be gained as the offenders go on in their non-criminal and daily routine activities (e.g., Beauregard et al, 2005;Brantingham & Brantingham, 1993;Clarke & Felson, 1993). The offender's familiarity with a specific site can also follow from the previously successful use of a specific site or type of environment to commit crimes.…”
Section: Environmental Consistency and Serial Offendersmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The offenders' environmental and site selection decision can then be seen as the reflection of their own knowledge and experience of the environment. This knowledge, as suggested previously, can be gained as the offenders go on in their non-criminal and daily routine activities (e.g., Beauregard et al, 2005;Brantingham & Brantingham, 1993;Clarke & Felson, 1993). The offender's familiarity with a specific site can also follow from the previously successful use of a specific site or type of environment to commit crimes.…”
Section: Environmental Consistency and Serial Offendersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Underpinning the notion of environmental backcloth is thus the idea that the occurrence of a criminal behavior (i.e., crime opportunity) is dependent on the offender's routine activity patterns and awareness space (e.g., places or areas that the offender visit or spend some time regularly and thus became familiar with -home location or neighborhood, areas where he works or go to for recreational purposes, etc. -and aware of), as well as the distribution of targets (Beauregard, Proulx, & Rossmo, 2005;Clarke & Felson, 1993;Deslauriers-Varin & Beauregard, 2010;Eck & Weisburd, 1995). Indeed, daily activities and lifestyles will nurture a criminal opportunity structure by enhancing the exposure and proximity of crime targets to motivated offenders (i.e., crime concentration) (Felson & Cohen, 1980;Miethe & Meier, 1990;Mustaine & Tewksbury, 2002).…”
Section: Crime Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on geographical profi ling and environmental criminology have so far mainly revolved around journey-to-crime distances in cases of robbery, rape, and serial or sexual homicides (e.g. Beauregard, Proulx, & Rossmo, 2005;Rossmo, 2000). To our knowledge, there are no empirical studies made on specifi cally rural area single homicides or missing persons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applicability of models of criminal spatial behaviour and, consequently, the efficacy of geographical profiling methods will, as Beauregard, Proulx and Rossmo (2005) discuss, be influenced by a wide range of environmental factors. These include; target backcloth; arterial roads and highways; boundaries (both psychological and physical); zoning (industrial, commercial, residential); land use (e.g., stores, bars, businesses); and neighbourhood demographics and characteristics (e.g.…”
Section: Geographical Profiling In a Novel Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%