2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial patterns of elevated magnetic susceptibility in progressive apraxia of speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that some cortical variants may show changes in cortical susceptibility because our group recently found that patients with progressive apraxia of speech, which is strongly associated with PSP-speech/language, 59 had greater susceptibility than control subjects in the white matter precentral gyrus. 33 The strength of this study is the novelty of applying QSM to the different PSP variants because, to our knowledge, no studies have addressed the susceptibility differences between different PSP clinical variants, PD, and CBS by using QSM. One of the limitations is that the number of patients is unbalanced between groups, and some groups had relatively small numbers of patients (eg, n = 4 in PSP-PI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We hypothesize that some cortical variants may show changes in cortical susceptibility because our group recently found that patients with progressive apraxia of speech, which is strongly associated with PSP-speech/language, 59 had greater susceptibility than control subjects in the white matter precentral gyrus. 33 The strength of this study is the novelty of applying QSM to the different PSP variants because, to our knowledge, no studies have addressed the susceptibility differences between different PSP clinical variants, PD, and CBS by using QSM. One of the limitations is that the number of patients is unbalanced between groups, and some groups had relatively small numbers of patients (eg, n = 4 in PSP-PI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All subjects underwent a standardized MRI protocol on a 3‐Tesla scanner (Magnetom Prisma; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), including a 3D magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence and a 3D multiecho gradient‐echo sequence. The imaging protocol and sequence parameters were the same as in previous studies 32,33 . The gradient‐echo sequence parameters were repetition time of 28.0 ms; echo times of 6.7, 10.6, 14.5, 18.4, and 22.4 ms; flip angle of 15°; a 20‐cm field of view, in‐plane acquisition matrix of 384 × 269, slice number of 88; slice thickness of 1.8 mm; and generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) acceleration factor of 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations