Spatial patterns and influencing factors of soil SOC、DOC、ROC at initial stage of vegetation restoration in a karst area

Abstract

Vegetation restoration has always been the focus of ecological research, but the synergistic effect of the soil carbon cycle and vegetation restoration succession process in karst area is still unclear. In this study, the complete succession zones of non-karst, karst, and karst vegetation restoration landforms in a National Nature Reserve, Caohai (Guizhou Province, China), were compared. The content distribution characteristics of SOC, ROC and DOC were investigated, as well as the geomorphology, spatial location and interaction were studied by using GLMM. The results show that the soil types and vegetation coverage of different landforms lead to a decrease in SOC in karst area with an increase in depth. The soil content in karst area was low, and in order to maintain the normal growth of vegetation, the proportion of soil ROC and DOC in SOC must be high, which leads to the order of soil ROC content in unrepaired area > vegetation restoration area > non-karst area. In addition, the content of SOC in the surface layer of the vegetation restoration area was lower than that of the unrepaired area and the non-karst area. The soil microbial activity in the vegetation restoration area is stronger, and more organic carbon was fixed in the plant. The vegetation coverage and diversity increased obviously and markedly as a result of dominant plants changing (from Gramineae to Gramineae + Compositae) in the karst vegetation restoration area, but the soil in the karst area could not provide sufficient nutrition for plants, ultimately resulting in an inverse ratio between surface SOC and vegetation diversity. This study aims to enhance understandings of ecological functions and vegetation restoration in karst areas, as well as responses to regional carbon cycling.

Adaptation of Asparagus munitus to karst adversity and its effects on soil

“…SOM is central to soil fertility and vegetation recovery [28,29] . Related studies have shown that N limits early-mid-stage karst ecosystem recovery [30] .…”

“…The SOM, TN, and AN were signi cantly elevated in SA compared to SC. SOM is pivotal for soil fertility [28] and vegetation recovery [29] . Related studies have revealed that nitrogen constraints early-mid-stage karst ecosystem recovery [30] .…”