1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00212.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial organization of proprioception in the cat spinocerebellum. Purkinje cell responses to passive foot rotation

Abstract: This study examines the spinocerebellar locations of Purkinje cells that responded to passive foot rotations at the ankle joint in anaesthetized cats. Using a novel approach for mapping the locations of recorded cells from several animals onto an unfolded two-dimensional representation of the cortex, we found that cells distributed throughout the anterior-posterior extent of the spinocerebellar cortex, except in the most medial parts corresponding to zones a and b, were responsive to ankle joint rotation. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compartmental organization of spinocerebellar mossy fibers is a classic model for studying mossy fiber topography because its termination pattern clearly illustrates the degree to which cerebellar afferents are organized at the structural (Voogd et al, 1969; Arsenio Nunes and Sotelo, 1985; Yaginuma and Matsushita, 1989; Gravel and Hawkes, 1990; Vogel and Prittie, 1994; Reeber et al, 2011), developmental (Vig et al, 2005; Sillitoe et al, 2010; Reeber et al, 2011) and functional (Perciavalle et al, 1998; Valle et al, 2012) levels. Based upon these well-known characteristics of the pathway, we injected WGA-Alexa conjugated tracers into upper lumber-lower thoracic spinocerebellar neurons to examine the terminal field distribution of afferent fibers within ectopic Purkinje cells in scrambler mutants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compartmental organization of spinocerebellar mossy fibers is a classic model for studying mossy fiber topography because its termination pattern clearly illustrates the degree to which cerebellar afferents are organized at the structural (Voogd et al, 1969; Arsenio Nunes and Sotelo, 1985; Yaginuma and Matsushita, 1989; Gravel and Hawkes, 1990; Vogel and Prittie, 1994; Reeber et al, 2011), developmental (Vig et al, 2005; Sillitoe et al, 2010; Reeber et al, 2011) and functional (Perciavalle et al, 1998; Valle et al, 2012) levels. Based upon these well-known characteristics of the pathway, we injected WGA-Alexa conjugated tracers into upper lumber-lower thoracic spinocerebellar neurons to examine the terminal field distribution of afferent fibers within ectopic Purkinje cells in scrambler mutants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these differences could be explained by the variability in positioning of the slices between rats and by the volume effects due to the relatively thick slices (1 mm, which is also the most likely cause of differences between the sagittal and coronal images), but it is likely that genuine differences were present between individual rats. Most of these differences may be caused by the normal variability in the gross anatomy of the brain, which is already obvious when the two rat brains shown in Figs 4 and 5(e) ach are compared [see also Perciavalle et al . (1998) for variability in sizes of the cat cerebellum and Steinmetz & Seitz (1991), Woods et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, these biases in Purkinje cell movement-related activity have been described mainly for whole-arm movements, whereas other studies that examined cerebellar sensory information processing in the context of single-joint movements pointed out a larger variety of Purkinje cell response patterns (e.g. Kolb & Rubia, 1980;Bauswein et al, 1983;Gray et al, 1993;Perciavalle et al, 1998). However, a possible explanation for this incongruence is that single joint movements recruit only part of the sensory-and motorrelated inputs to the cerebellar cortex not allowing therefore the type of transformation of sensory (or sensori-motor) information that might produce response biases across the cerebellar cortex.…”
Section: Response Patterns To Passive Arm Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, this type of organization might represent a valid framework for the organization of proprioceptive information. In a recent study, Perciavalle et al (1998) mapped Purkinje cells responses to passive¯exion/extension movements of the cat's ankle and found that neurons responding to ankle movements were intercalated with others that did not respond. The result of the present study is, in this respect, very similar.…”
Section: Mapping Arm-related Purkinje Cells In the Spinocerebellummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation