2002
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial organisation and behaviour of the parental chromosome sets in the nuclei of Saccharomyces cerevisiae × S. paradoxus hybrids

Abstract: We demonstrate that the genomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus are sufficiently divergent to allow their differential labeling by genomic in situ hybridisation (GISH). The cytological discrimination of the genomes allowed us to study the merging of the two genomes during hybrid mating. GISH revealed that in hybrid nuclei the two genomes are intermixed. In hybrid meiosis, extensive intraspectific nonhomologous pairing takes place. GISH on chromosome addition and substitution strains (with chromoso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This topological genome separation has also been observed in mouse hybrid embryos (Mayer et al, 2000) and in nuclei fusing human sperm with a hamster egg (Brandriff et al, 1991). On the other hand, in a yeast hybrid between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus the parental genomes were observed as intermixing just after hybrid mating (Lorenz et al, 2002). The functional role and maintenance mechanism of genome separation, however, remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This topological genome separation has also been observed in mouse hybrid embryos (Mayer et al, 2000) and in nuclei fusing human sperm with a hamster egg (Brandriff et al, 1991). On the other hand, in a yeast hybrid between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus the parental genomes were observed as intermixing just after hybrid mating (Lorenz et al, 2002). The functional role and maintenance mechanism of genome separation, however, remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The classical genetic and molecular methods applied, such as sporulation and crosses, karyotyping, AFLP analysis, DNA-DNA hybridization, and the partial sequencing of a few selected genes, were not sufficient to fully characterize the hybrid genomes. These methods were sufficient, however, to indicate that hybrid lines generally undergo progressive genome stabilization, during which large genomic rearrangements occur, including aneuploidization, chromosomal translocation, and partial or total chromosome loss (6,42,90,99,123,174,175,198). Gene amplification also occurs, especially in subtelomeric regions of chromosomes.…”
Section: Evolution Of Hybrid Genomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cell counting, fixed cells were sonicated gently, treated with Triton X-100 and DAPI as described above, and examined with a Nikon E-800 microscope using a Plan Fluor 100ϫ differential interference contrast objective. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and FISH ϩ immunofluorescence experiments were done as described in Lorenz et al (2002) and Fuchs and Loidl (2004)). Images were taken using a Zeiss Axioskop microscope with a 100ϫ/1.30 Plan-Neofluar objective and a Quantix camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ) controlled by IPLab software.…”
Section: Cytologymentioning
confidence: 99%