2022
DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v36i1.7386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Modeling for Urban Resilience Assessment: Using AHP and GIS (Case Study of Bou-Saâda City, Algeria)

Abstract: The aim of the research is spatial modeling to assess urban resilience. A group of Delphi experts were involved, in stages, to select the final criteria. Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) by (AHP), the final criteria were ranked according to weight and importance. Criteria maps within a GIS environment were combined with AHP results, to create an Urban Resilience Map (URM). The results showed that (52.19%) of the study area achieved high resilience, (30.86%) medium resilience and (16.95%) low resil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preparation of resilience maps can be improved by integrating multi-criteria decision making (MCDA) with geographic information systems (GIS), as demonstrated in previous studies [16][17][18][19][20]. While GIS is a tool for analyzing, editing, and managing spatial data, multi-criteria decision-making methods involve combining and transforming criteria maps and decision-makers' priorities to obtain valuable decision-making information [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preparation of resilience maps can be improved by integrating multi-criteria decision making (MCDA) with geographic information systems (GIS), as demonstrated in previous studies [16][17][18][19][20]. While GIS is a tool for analyzing, editing, and managing spatial data, multi-criteria decision-making methods involve combining and transforming criteria maps and decision-makers' priorities to obtain valuable decision-making information [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%