1977
DOI: 10.1016/0023-9690(77)90054-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial memory and radial arm maze performance of rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
178
2
5

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
178
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, for intact rats, even dramatic response stereotypy does not allow us to infer that the animals are relying on a response algorithm. Other evidence is required before such a conclusion may be drawn [12,27]. The subjects in this experiment apparently engaged in stereotyped responding in addition to selecting arms on the basis of another strategy, rather than relying on a response algorithm instead of some other strategy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, for intact rats, even dramatic response stereotypy does not allow us to infer that the animals are relying on a response algorithm. Other evidence is required before such a conclusion may be drawn [12,27]. The subjects in this experiment apparently engaged in stereotyped responding in addition to selecting arms on the basis of another strategy, rather than relying on a response algorithm instead of some other strategy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For these subjects, any inference that the manipulation has caused a strange in strategy must be made cautiously [9,14,21]. Several procedures [12,27] allow one to determine whether subjects perform effectively after the use of response algorithms has been eliminated. The taskcompletion pause measure will allow one to determine, without a change in procedure, whether subjects currently exhibiting response stereotypy are depending solely on response algorithms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revisits to arms that have been visited previously in the trial are considered errors because food is no longer available. Previous work has shown that rats make very few errors in an eight-arm maze (e.g., Olton & Samuelson, 1976) and perform above chance in a 17-arm maze (Olton, Collison, & Werz, 1977). The cues necessary for accurate performance are the extramaze cues associated with the arms rather than odors or response algorithms; that fact makes it clear that performance in this task depends on some form of short-term or working memory system (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, rats seem more likely to avoid revisiting more recent choices than choices made earlier. This recency effect implies that retrospective coding is being used (but see Olton et al, 1977 for an alternative explanation of the recency effects found by Olton and Samuelson, 1976). If prospective memory were being used, then there should be no relation between the order in which arms are visited and the probability of revisiting them, because memory would not contain representations of the arms already visited, but instead would contain representations of anticipated future choices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the RAM is believed to tap distal spatial (allothetic) cues [13] but the drug may alter this strategy and thus improve performance. While possible, the pattern of errors made would suggest that enhanced motivation to obtain a reward, enhanced attention and/or enhanced spatial working memory were greater factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%