1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1984.tb00896.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Mapping of Conductive Ground Water Contamination With Electromagnetic Induction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2008). To speed up the process, various studies have shown how non‐contact electromagnetic (EM) induction probes can be used to map the areal distribution of a leachate plume (Weber et al. , 1984; Woldt et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2008). To speed up the process, various studies have shown how non‐contact electromagnetic (EM) induction probes can be used to map the areal distribution of a leachate plume (Weber et al. , 1984; Woldt et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use has been made of geophysical techniques, most commonly direct current (dc) resistivity techniques such as in Malaysia (Samsudin et al, 2006), USA (Zume et al, 2006), Turkey (Kaya et al, 2007) and Israel (Frid et al, 2008). To speed up the process, various studies have shown how non-contact electromagnetic (EM) induction probes can be used to map the areal distribution of a leachate plume (Weber et al, 1984;Woldt et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EM methods the surface is not affected by changes in the location of applied downhole or between holes require nonconthe source electrode ii' the source electrode is relatively ductive (such as PVC) cased holes that could be located far away, Thus, the differencing of apparent ouLside the cover boundary. Electromagnetic induction resistivities measured on the surface from two source surveys are described by Benson (1984); McNeill positions at depth would be small in the absence o1'the (1980); Topp et al (1980);Weber et al (1984Weber et al ( , 1985, deep feature (concrete vault), However, because the Ground penetrating radar surveys are described by vault is relatively close to the buried electrodes, the Danicls (1989) and Benson (1984). Crosshole pattern of potential distribution changes significantly electronmgnetic surveys are described by Daily and for changes in source position.…”
Section: -36mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the near surface, a Geonics EM31 was used to map the areal distribution of a leachate plume in coastal sands (Nobes et al, 2000). Where depth to water table information was required, Weber et al (1984) employed a one‐dimensional linearized inverse approach, while Woldt et al (1998) resolved the depth of a leachate plume by calculating the depth where most of the EM34 signal contribution occurs. More recently, Kaya et al (2007) delineated soil and groundwater contamination using very low frequency EM methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%