Spatial Modeling and Assessment of Urban Form 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54217-1_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Land Use Change Modeling Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 131 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A decline in the coherence value (or a complete decorrelation) is deemed to represent surface changes that have resulted from events and processes that disturbed or altered the arrangement of scatterers within a pixel [58][59][60][61]. Coherence-based change detections are more capable of and sensitive to detecting subtle surface changes that otherwise may not be noticeable in SAR amplitude images due to little changes and variations in backscattering intensity [47,[60][61][62].…”
Section: Floodwater Delineation Approaches and Possible Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decline in the coherence value (or a complete decorrelation) is deemed to represent surface changes that have resulted from events and processes that disturbed or altered the arrangement of scatterers within a pixel [58][59][60][61]. Coherence-based change detections are more capable of and sensitive to detecting subtle surface changes that otherwise may not be noticeable in SAR amplitude images due to little changes and variations in backscattering intensity [47,[60][61][62].…”
Section: Floodwater Delineation Approaches and Possible Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%