2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial knowledge acquisition and mobile maps: The role of environmental legibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), they had a detrimental effect on the acquisition and retention of environmental knowledge, as well as people's ability to attend to their surroundings. Similar effects have been reported in a variety of other studies (Ahmadpoor and Smith, 2020;Ishikawa and Takahashi, 2013;Parush, Ahuvia and Erev, 2007b;Klippel, Hirtle and Davies, 2010;Ahmadpoor and Heath, 2018;Aslan et al 2006;Ishikawa et al, 2008;Krüger et al, 2004;Münzer et al, 2006;Willis et al, 2009;Ruginski et al, 2019), and it is clear that they are not simply a product of using any form of external representational system. Münzer et al (2006), for instance, found that individuals using physical maps exhibited superior spatial orientation and survey knowledge compared to those using digital navigation systems.…”
Section: Urban Legibility and Gpssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), they had a detrimental effect on the acquisition and retention of environmental knowledge, as well as people's ability to attend to their surroundings. Similar effects have been reported in a variety of other studies (Ahmadpoor and Smith, 2020;Ishikawa and Takahashi, 2013;Parush, Ahuvia and Erev, 2007b;Klippel, Hirtle and Davies, 2010;Ahmadpoor and Heath, 2018;Aslan et al 2006;Ishikawa et al, 2008;Krüger et al, 2004;Münzer et al, 2006;Willis et al, 2009;Ruginski et al, 2019), and it is clear that they are not simply a product of using any form of external representational system. Münzer et al (2006), for instance, found that individuals using physical maps exhibited superior spatial orientation and survey knowledge compared to those using digital navigation systems.…”
Section: Urban Legibility and Gpssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For example, one might expect to observe little contrast between digital map users and other navigators in a setting with high environmental legibility, but a greater difference when legibility is lower and, therefore, requires more cognitive effort to accurately encode. We recently examined this very issue, using a sketch map method to interrogate the accuracy of participants' mental representations of a novel urban route (Ahmadpoor and Smith, 2020). Participants followed a route between key urban landmarks that was either specified by a mobile map solution or through direct experience of the environment (e.g.…”
Section: Urban Legibility and Gpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, there was no significant difference in the route distance judgment and route recognition type tasks by map size. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that in the route knowledge tasks, the participants asked for and assessed the knowledge of directions between landmarks from an egocentric perspective [4,31,42,43]. Previous studies have found that when users operate a mobile device for wayfinding, it restricts the convenience of acquiring map content caused by the limited screen size [1,2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of modern technology, the interactive interface of mobile devices could mitigate the shortcomings of their limited screen size. Furthermore, when users acquire spatial knowledge from a mobile map, the different map sizes may influence the wayfinding performance [3][4][5][6]. According to the literature, limited research has been conducted to investigate how interactive interfaces and map size affect usability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to conducting interviews to measure the perceived level of thermal comfort, some researchers have used mental maps in combination with questionnaires for research in this area. Mental or cognitive maps are among the primary tools for analyzing people's experiences of spaces and therefore, the basic means for gaining urban knowledge (Aram et al, 2019a(Aram et al, , 2019c(Aram et al, , 2019dAhmadpoor and Shahab, 2019;Ahmadpoor and Smith, 2020). In a study carried out in the Netherlands, a combination of interviews and cognitive maps was used to identify the variables affecting the psychological of thermal comfort (Klemm et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Psychological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%