“…Kriging and idw are cited as the most commonly used methods [48,49]. Thus, the idw method has been used for the interpolation of heavy metals in groundwater in the Dehradun district in India [50], while the Kriging method has been used for the spatial interpolation of the water quality index in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in Pakistan [51]. The results in this paper show that different spatial interpolation methods yield different maps from the same data, which is consistent with previous studies [69].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As mentioned earlier, interpolation methods are used to map the distribution of pollution in groundwater. The inverse distance weighting method was used for the interpolation of heavy metals in groundwater in the Dehradun district in India [50], while the kriging method was used for the spatial interpolation of the water quality index in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in Pakistan [51].…”
The localization of pollution sources is one of the main tasks in environmental engineering. For this paper, models of spatial distribution of nitrate concentration in groundwater were created, and the point of highest concentration was determined. This point represents the assumed location of the pollution source and differs from the actual location, so there is a certain distance between the measured and assumed location. This paper puts forward a new hypothesis that the distance between the measured and the assumed location is a function of the variance of the estimation error. The scientific contribution of this paper is based on the fact that the interaction of statistical and geostatistical methods can locate the dominant point source of pollution or narrow down the search area. The above hypothesis is confirmed by the example of the Varaždin wellfield, which was closed due to an excessively high groundwater nitrate concentration. Seven different interpolation methods were used to create spatial distribution models. Each method provides a different model, a different variance of the estimation error, and estimates of the location of the pollution source. The smallest value of variance of the estimation error of 1.65 was obtained for the minimum curvature interpolation method and the largest value of variance (24.49) was obtained for the kriging with logarithmic variogram. Our results show a nonlinear and monotonic relationship between the distance and the variance of the estimation error, so logarithmic and rational quadratic models were fitted to the scatter point data. The models were linearized, a t-test was performed, and the results show that the models can be considered reliable, which is confirmed by the values of the coefficients of determination of the linearized models, which are around 0.50. The obtained results can be used in planning additional research work to determine the measured location of the pollution source. The research methodology we used is universal and can be applied to other locations where high concentrations of certain contaminants have been detected in groundwater in alluvial aquifers.
“…Kriging and idw are cited as the most commonly used methods [48,49]. Thus, the idw method has been used for the interpolation of heavy metals in groundwater in the Dehradun district in India [50], while the Kriging method has been used for the spatial interpolation of the water quality index in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in Pakistan [51]. The results in this paper show that different spatial interpolation methods yield different maps from the same data, which is consistent with previous studies [69].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As mentioned earlier, interpolation methods are used to map the distribution of pollution in groundwater. The inverse distance weighting method was used for the interpolation of heavy metals in groundwater in the Dehradun district in India [50], while the kriging method was used for the spatial interpolation of the water quality index in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in Pakistan [51].…”
The localization of pollution sources is one of the main tasks in environmental engineering. For this paper, models of spatial distribution of nitrate concentration in groundwater were created, and the point of highest concentration was determined. This point represents the assumed location of the pollution source and differs from the actual location, so there is a certain distance between the measured and assumed location. This paper puts forward a new hypothesis that the distance between the measured and the assumed location is a function of the variance of the estimation error. The scientific contribution of this paper is based on the fact that the interaction of statistical and geostatistical methods can locate the dominant point source of pollution or narrow down the search area. The above hypothesis is confirmed by the example of the Varaždin wellfield, which was closed due to an excessively high groundwater nitrate concentration. Seven different interpolation methods were used to create spatial distribution models. Each method provides a different model, a different variance of the estimation error, and estimates of the location of the pollution source. The smallest value of variance of the estimation error of 1.65 was obtained for the minimum curvature interpolation method and the largest value of variance (24.49) was obtained for the kriging with logarithmic variogram. Our results show a nonlinear and monotonic relationship between the distance and the variance of the estimation error, so logarithmic and rational quadratic models were fitted to the scatter point data. The models were linearized, a t-test was performed, and the results show that the models can be considered reliable, which is confirmed by the values of the coefficients of determination of the linearized models, which are around 0.50. The obtained results can be used in planning additional research work to determine the measured location of the pollution source. The research methodology we used is universal and can be applied to other locations where high concentrations of certain contaminants have been detected in groundwater in alluvial aquifers.
“…Kriging is a minimum-variance, spatial interpolation method that makes predictions with the weighted values of neighboring data of the point or area to be predicted, utilizing spatial dependence models obtained from covariance or semi-variogram functions (Krivoruchko 2005 ). In this specific context, ordinary kriging, which is a simple and widely used approach to estimate the study variable, was preferred due to its capability to provide both prediction values and associated prediction errors (Webster and Oliver 2007 ; Oliver and Webster 2015 ; Khan et al 2023 ; Vedurmudi et al 2023 ). Ordinary kriging is calculated with the following Eq.…”
Increased use of recreational areas after the lifting of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions has led to increased noise levels. This study aims to determine the level of noise pollution experienced in recreational areas with the increasing domestic and international tourism activities after the lifting of pandemic lockdowns, to produce spatial distribution maps of noise pollution, and to develop strategic planning suggestions for reducing noise pollution in line with the results obtained. Antalya-Konyaaltı Beach Recreation Area, the most important international tourism destination of Turkey, is determined as the study area. To determine the existing noise pollution, 31 measurement points were marked at 100 m intervals within the study area. Noise measurements were taken during the daytime (07:00–19:00), evening (19:00–23:00), and nighttime (23:00–07:00) on weekdays (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) and weekends (Sunday) over 2 months in the summer when the lockdown was lifted. In addition, the sound level at each measurement point was recorded for 15 min, while the number of vehicles passing through the area during the same period was determined. The database created as a result of measurements and observations was analyzed using statistical and geostatistical methods. After the analysis of the data, it was found that the co-kriging-stable model showed superior performance in noise mapping. Additionally, it was revealed that there is a high correlation between traffic density and noise intensity, with the highest equivalent noise level (Leq) on weekdays and weekend evenings due to traffic and user density. In conclusion, regions exposed to intense noise pollution were identified and strategic planning recommendations were developed to prevent/reduce noise sources in these identified regions.
“…Considering the difference of precipitation on the windward slope and the leeward slope in spatial interpolation, Yan et al [56] showed that the co-Kriging interpolation method of the spherical model and the semi-variance function was adopted in the spatial interpolation of precipitation in Guizhou Province, and better results were obtained. This method considered the influence of the terrain and slope face on precipitation [57]. In addition, the Xijiang River Basin and Guizhou Province have great geographical similarities.…”
The Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network model is an effective deep learning approach for predicting streamflow, and the investigation of the interpretability of deep learning models in streamflow prediction is of great significance for model transfer and improvement. In this study, four key hydrological stations in the Xijiang River Basin (XJB) in South China are taken as examples, and the performance of the LSTM model and its variant models in runoff prediction were evaluated under the same foresight period, and the impacts of different foresight periods on the prediction results were investigated based on the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to explore the interpretability of the LSTM model in runoff prediction. The results showed that (1) LSTM was the optimal model among the four models in the XJB; (2) the predicted results of the LSTM model decreased with the increase in foresight period, with the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) decreasing by 4.7% when the foresight period increased from one month to two months, and decreasing by 3.9% when the foresight period increased from two months to three months; (3) historical runoff had the greatest impact on streamflow prediction, followed by precipitation, evaporation, and the North Pacific Index (NPI); except evaporation, all the others were positively correlated. The results can provide a reference for monthly runoff prediction in the XJB.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.