2007
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00511.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Interaction Between Spectral Integration and Frequency Gradient in Primary Auditory Cortex

Abstract: Primary sensory cortical areas are characterized by orderly and largely independent representations of several receptive field properties. This is expressed in multiple, spatially overlaying parameter distributions, such as orientation preference, spatial frequency, and ocular dominance maps in the primary visual cortex. In the auditory cortex, two main and presumably independent representational parameters are the center frequency and the frequency extent of spectral tuning curves. Here we demonstrate interac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(62 reference statements)
7
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inverse of the parameter ⌬ shows a bell-shaped dependency (i.e., a decrease in the population susceptibility for the midfrequency region) with the carrier frequency ( f c ). This result is in agreement with the variations of the narrow (broad) bandwidth Q 10 (Q 40 ) along the anteroposterior axis of the A1 (Imaizumi and Schreiner, 2007). Middle and bottom, Distributions in A1 of the population codifiers of the modulation frequency and the amplitude, which were also heterogeneously distributed.…”
Section: Spatial Aggregation/segregation Of Attribute Codifierssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inverse of the parameter ⌬ shows a bell-shaped dependency (i.e., a decrease in the population susceptibility for the midfrequency region) with the carrier frequency ( f c ). This result is in agreement with the variations of the narrow (broad) bandwidth Q 10 (Q 40 ) along the anteroposterior axis of the A1 (Imaizumi and Schreiner, 2007). Middle and bottom, Distributions in A1 of the population codifiers of the modulation frequency and the amplitude, which were also heterogeneously distributed.…”
Section: Spatial Aggregation/segregation Of Attribute Codifierssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…6, top, bottom left subplot), we found a decrease in the population susceptibility for the midfrequency region along the anteroposterior axis. In our opinion, this is caused by the increase in Q 10 and Q 40 in this region of A1, as was recently reported for cats [Imaizumi and Schreiner (2007), their Fig. 2].…”
Section: Spatial Aggregation/segregation Of Attribute Codifierssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This "overrepresentation" of the higher sound frequencies (in this case, particularly of the octave centered at 20 kHz; Fig. 2D) has been noted previously in cat AI (Imaizumi and Schreiner 2007) but is quite variable between cats (see, e.g., Fig. 8).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…A pair of recent in vivo two-photon calcium imaging studies have indicated that, at the level of wellisolated units of presumably various cell types in layers II and III, the distribution of CFs appears more disordered on small distance scales (Bandyopadhyay et al 2010;Rothschild et al 2010). Thus more superficial layers of AI exhibit a more coarse tonotopy, a fact not entirely unexpected given the extensive frequency integration that occurs in AI (Happel et al 2010;Imaizumi and Schreiner 2007;Kaur et al 2004;Read et al 2001;Schreiner et al 2000;Wallace et al 1991;Winer 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, cortical frequency tuning arises from the interaction and convergence of different subsets of concurring afferent, local, and long-range intracortical inputs. The spatial and temporal interaction of these different pathways during sound processing is still a matter of debate (L. M. Miller et al, 2001b;Imaizumi and Schreiner, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%