2014
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial incongruence among hotspots and complementary areas of tree diversity in southern Africa

Abstract: Aim Biodiversity hotspots have important roles in conservation prioritisation, but efficient methods for selecting among them remain debated. Location Southern Africa. Methods In this study, we used data on the dated phylogeny and geographical distribution of 1400 tree species in southern Africa to map regional hotspots of species richness (SR), phylogenetic diversity (PD), phylogenetic endemism (PE), species endemism (CWE), and evolutionary distinctiveness and global endangerment (EDGE). In addition, we evalu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, as previously reported, the development of new metrics that consider multiple aspects of biodiversity could help to provide new insights into the mechanisms that underlie the current patterns of biological diversity. Nowadays, an increasing number of studies (e.g., Daru et al, 2014) reinforce the need to adopt more integrative strategies, which considering evolutionary components and geographical distribution data, can better identify areas of high conservation priority.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, as previously reported, the development of new metrics that consider multiple aspects of biodiversity could help to provide new insights into the mechanisms that underlie the current patterns of biological diversity. Nowadays, an increasing number of studies (e.g., Daru et al, 2014) reinforce the need to adopt more integrative strategies, which considering evolutionary components and geographical distribution data, can better identify areas of high conservation priority.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In consequence, to conserve the whole spectrum of biological variation, it is obviously not enough to only focus on species richness as a measure of biodiversity on the continental scale (Orme et al . ; Daru, Bank & Davies ) or the island scale (Di Virgilio et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result may stem from the property of these measures, whereby increases in species richness and biological traits can only generate a small change in phylogenetic diversity (Pool et al, 2014;Schweiger et al, 2008). Actually, increasing numbers of studies have revealed spatial mismatches among patterns of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity of disparate aquatic (de Carvalho & Tejerina-Garro, 2015;Heino, Soininen, Lappalainen, & Virtanen, 2005) and terrestrial organism groups (Daru et al, 2015;Devictor et al, 2010). The scatter plots depict the importance of species identity, where increased scatter implying stronger effects of species identity as opposed to species richness.…”
Section: Congruence Among Different Facets Of Diversity and Its Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of biodiversity conservation, FD and PD should be both considered as important facets of diversity for ensuring the provision of ecosystem services and for representing an evolutionary history of the focal taxonomic group (Devictor et al, 2010). Unfortunately, our understanding of how different facets of diversity are patterned and how they are associated with each other is currently limited (Cilleros, Allard, Grenouillet, & Brosse, 2016;Daru, Bank, & Davies, 2015;Pardo et al, 2017). Unfortunately, our understanding of how different facets of diversity are patterned and how they are associated with each other is currently limited (Cilleros, Allard, Grenouillet, & Brosse, 2016;Daru, Bank, & Davies, 2015;Pardo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%