2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the set of background conditions selected for the analysis may be unsuccessful in encapsulating the institutional setting and administrative constraints of higher level authorities at least partially constraining the flexibility for municipalities in defining their waste policies. As an alternative to the conditional version of the BoD-model, to address the issue of spatial proximity/dependence, a recent extension of Fusco et al (2018) is implemented. The notion is to compare and evaluate municipalities with local potential competitors in a way such that the BoD-model accounts for the underlying spatial point pattern process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the set of background conditions selected for the analysis may be unsuccessful in encapsulating the institutional setting and administrative constraints of higher level authorities at least partially constraining the flexibility for municipalities in defining their waste policies. As an alternative to the conditional version of the BoD-model, to address the issue of spatial proximity/dependence, a recent extension of Fusco et al (2018) is implemented. The notion is to compare and evaluate municipalities with local potential competitors in a way such that the BoD-model accounts for the underlying spatial point pattern process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the institutional setting and administrative constraints of higher level authorities at least partially constraining the flexibility for municipalities in defining their waste policies). Therefore, as an alternative to the conditional version of the BoD-model, to address the issue of spatial proximity/dependence, a recent extension of Fusco et al (2018) is implemented.…”
Section: Choice Of the Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved by allowing dynamic inefficiency to be a function of both individual and neighbour characteristics as Skevas and Grashuis (2020) do in a static inefficiency framework. Although not using exact location information of latitude and longitude and not applied to agriculture, Fusco et al (2018Fusco et al ( , 2019 present an alternative single-step DEA approach in which the inefficiency of each unit is measured relative to other units that belong to the same territory and where the number of neighbours is estimated empirically. However, this study uses the Skevas and Grashuis (2020) approach where inefficiency is first calculated based on a common frontier and spatial spillovers are sought in a second-stage regression.…”
Section: Spatial Truncated Bootstrap Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Previous studies using survey data have shown that respondent characteristics do significantly affect the attainable setor at least the perceived attainable set(Cordero, Salinas-Jiménez, & Salinas-Jiménez, 2017;Verschelde & Rogge, 2012). In addition, other environmental variables can be related to the frontier, such as the location of the evaluated unit(Fusco, Vidoli, & Sahoo, 2017) and its political environment(Kristof De Witte & Geys, 2013). In order to circumvent the restrictive separability condition, we choose to develop our model building on the work of…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%