2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-018-3516-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial heterogeneity and controls of ecosystem metabolism in a Great Plains river network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others are primarily temporally distributed (e.g., large diel temperature cycles, but which roughly mirror each other at locations many kilometres apart). Still others are both spatially and temporally (spatiotemporally) distributed (e.g., primary production varies in response to both spatial heterogeneity in benthic autotroph cover and diel cycles in solar insolation; Reichert, Uehlinger, & Acuña, ; Dodds et al, ). Because measurements are made in water parcels moving through both space and time, Lagrangian sampling integrates both spatial and temporal variation (Hensley et al, ) making identification of causal processes difficult (Ensign et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others are primarily temporally distributed (e.g., large diel temperature cycles, but which roughly mirror each other at locations many kilometres apart). Still others are both spatially and temporally (spatiotemporally) distributed (e.g., primary production varies in response to both spatial heterogeneity in benthic autotroph cover and diel cycles in solar insolation; Reichert, Uehlinger, & Acuña, ; Dodds et al, ). Because measurements are made in water parcels moving through both space and time, Lagrangian sampling integrates both spatial and temporal variation (Hensley et al, ) making identification of causal processes difficult (Ensign et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data in aggregate suggest careful determination of what constitutes a "representative" reach required to obtain results reflecting general metabolic rates in a river. Few studies we are aware of do this in addition to Reichert et al (2009), Demars et al (2015, and Dodds et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Estimation of reaeration rate in streams is important to properly estimate the ecosystem metabolism 3 . In this study, the reaeration rate was estimated by the BASE v2.0 model using the time series of DO data 33 , 42 , 43 . BASE v2.0 is certainly advantageous for estimating reaeration rate and thus stream metabolic rates with the statistical reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%