2021
DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Hearing Difficulties in Reaching Space in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children Improve With Head Movements

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
23
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(121 reference statements)
5
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is coherent with previous studies that investigated the benefits of head-movements on front-back discrimination in young adults with normal-hearing (Perrett and Noble, 1997a,b;Iwaya et al, 2003) or with hearing-impairment (Mueller et al, 2014;Brimijoin and Akeroyd, 2016). Similarly, it corroborates the benefit of head-movements for sound localization in front space reported for young adults with normal-hearing (Brimijoin et al, 2013;Morikawa and Hirahara, 2013) or hearing-impairment (Coudert et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is coherent with previous studies that investigated the benefits of head-movements on front-back discrimination in young adults with normal-hearing (Perrett and Noble, 1997a,b;Iwaya et al, 2003) or with hearing-impairment (Mueller et al, 2014;Brimijoin and Akeroyd, 2016). Similarly, it corroborates the benefit of head-movements for sound localization in front space reported for young adults with normal-hearing (Brimijoin et al, 2013;Morikawa and Hirahara, 2013) or hearing-impairment (Coudert et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Head-movements during sound improve sound localization in normal-hearing adults on both horizontal and vertical dimensions (Perrett and Noble, 1997a ) and reduce front-back discrimination errors (Iwaya et al, 2003 ). In addition, head-movements improve sound localization in hearing-impaired adults (Brimijoin et al, 2012 ) and cochlear implant users (adults: Pastore et al, 2018 ; children: Coudert et al, 2022 ). If head-movements can improve sound localization in the context of ARHL remains, to the best of our knowledge, an open question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our VR approach to spatial hearing made it possible to study head movements throughout the experiment and we always presented sounds with long durations (i.e., until response, during the training phase; or 3 seconds long, during the head-pointing task) precisely to examine the contribution of head-movements during training and generalization. Our work adds to the limited body of work that focused on spontaneous head-movements during sound localization relearning [ 46 48 , 51 ] by contributing two main findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Indeed, in the study by Bahu and colleagues ( 2016 ), despite training the participants to familiarize with the pointing method to the sound sources, participants had difficulty performing the motor task, especially for the rear sound sources. Our ‘simple’ approach is particularly relevant for the eventual aim of applying this same methodology to developmental and clinical populations (for example, this pointing method to sound source has been used without any difficulty with children, (Coudert et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most interestingly, SPHERE proved sensitive for detecting and quantifying the contribution of free head motion during sound emission, with improvements to sound localization accuracy and precision. The SPHERE approach has been used recently with adult and pediatric populations, on both normal-hearing participants and cochlear implant patients (Coudert et al 2022 ; Valzolgher, et al 2020a , b , 2020a ; Valzolgher et al 2022 ). It offers a highly versatile opportunity to assess normal and pathological sound localization performance in a more ecologically valid approach (for discussion see Russell 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%