Spatial health and life sciences business ecosystem: a case study of San Diego

Abstract

Purpose: Increasing competition in global markets requires many countries to seek new growth sectors. In addition, the nature of competition is changing. This paper applies the business ecosystem concept and studies San Diego as a spatial health and life sciences ecosystem. The aim is to identify issues that should be considered in design of innovation policies and regional industry development.Design/methodology/approach: The research approach is built on a literature review of business ecosystems and spatial innovation. The empirical study is based on semistructured interviews, observations, and information gathering and verification during field research. Findings:The results include a description of the ecosystem structure and dynamics. This paper demonstrates the bottom-up nature of San Diego's health and life sciences ecosystem without a dominant lead actor, and presents prerequisites for fostering spatial ecosystems. Research limitations/implications:A single case may not be able to offer a generalized picture of this topic. However, the study raises several considerations for researchers and decision-makers involved in innovation policy design. Future work should extend the study and involve other spatial and substance contexts to compare findings and to pursue a more generic picture of innovation ecosystems and networks.Originality/value: This paper demonstrates that applying the concept of business ecosystems to the spatial context provides new insights in terms of dynamic mechanisms and factors contributing to economic growth in a particular location. Understanding how to facilitate the creation of successful spatial ecosystems is in the focal point of innovation policies.

A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda

“…The importance of the regional study of innovation systems spawns from the fact that specific regions possess a certain social order, culture, and institutional routines, as well as norms and values, which impact the manner of interaction among actors (Buesa et al 2006, Cooke et al 1997. Studies focusing on regional spaces highlight for example the role of critical mass (Georghiou et al 2014) and other local conditions (Majava et al 2016) that allow for a region to be competitive. A sectoral innovation system, on the other hand, refers to "a set of products and the set of agents carrying out market and non-market interactions for the creation, production and sale of those products" (Malerba 2002), within certain sectors or industries.…”

Research on the Harmonization Evaluation of Regional Logistics Ecosystem Based on Entropy Weight and DEA

“…Because the research of the harmonization of industrial ecosystem just starts and the research on the harmonization of industrial cluster ecosystem is scarce, the evaluation standard of harmonization has not yet formed a unified consensus. At present, some scholars divide the natural ecosystem harmonization evaluation criteria into harmonization, sub-harmonization and disease these three kinds of standards [8] . In order to describe this metric result more concisely, it is possible to divide the evaluation grades of regional logistics ecosystem harmonization into five states: harmonious state (V), harmonious state (IV), Basic harmonization (IIII), disharmonization (II), harmonization state difference (I) in the light of the general level of industrial ecosystem harmonization.…”

Regional development platforms as incubators of business ecosystems. Case study: The Lahti urban region, Finland

“…Majava, Leviäkangas, Kinnunen, Kess, and Foit (2016) study the health and life sciences ecosystem of San Diego as a spatial business ecosystem and identify issues that should be considered when designing innovation policy and regional industry development. They emphasise the role of, for example, the availability of different forms of capital, an entrepreneurial culture that enables risk‐taking and accepts failure, local conditions that attract new talent, a strong knowledge ecosystem, platforms for formal and informal cooperation, and committed leadership.…”