Spatial-frequency-contingent color aftereffects: Adaptation with one-dimensional stimuli

Abstract

The McCollough effect was shown to be spatial-frequency selective by Lovegrove and Over (1972) after adaptation with vertical colored square-wave gratings separated by 1 octave. Adaptation with slide-presented red and green vertical square-wave gratings separated by 1 octave failed to produce contingent color aftereffects (CAEs). However, when each of these gratings was adapted alone, strong CAEs were produced. Adaptation with vertical colored sine-wave gratings separated by 1 octave also failed to produce CAEs, but strong effects were produced by adaptation with each grating alone. By varying the spatial frequency of the test sine wave, CAEs were found to be tuned for spatial frequency at 2.85 octaves after adaptation of 4 cycles per degree (cpd) and at 2.30 octaves after adaptation of 8 cpd. Adaptation of both vertical and horizontal sine-wave gratings produced strong CAEs, with bandwidths ranging from 1.96 to 2.90 octaves and with lower adapting contrast producing weaker CAEs. These results indicate that the McCollough effect is more broadly tuned for spatial frequency than are simple adaptation effects.

What is important about McCollough effects? Reply to Allan and Siegel.

“…What is the compensatory response to an afterimage? (c) Patterns that are very difficult to discriminate can be used to induce an ME (Over, Blackwell, & Axton, 1984; Thompson & Travis, 1989); some stimuli that are readily discriminable do not produce MEs (Day, Webster, Gillies, & Crassini, 1992; Fidell, 1970). (d) Some effects of drugs on the ME also seem to cause difficulty (Byth, Logue, Bell, Best, & King, 1992; Shute, 1979).…”