2023
DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2023.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial evaluation of groundwater quality using factor analysis and geostatistical Kriging algorithm: a case study of Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria

Abstract: Necessity calls for the environmental aspects of groundwater to be evaluated and properly managed based on the observed spatial distribution with respect to quality, as it contributes to a significant portion of average water usage globally. Variations in groundwater quality in the Ibadan Metropolis might be a result of physical and chemical trends in the region leading to a decline in quality. The study was geared towards the spatial evaluation of groundwater quality using factor analysis and the Kriging algo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation showed that these parameters are higher down the river flow. A similar observation in parameter variations was made by Thomas [74] in the spatial evaluation of groundwater quality using factor analysis and geostatistical Kriging algorithm: a case study of Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis and Spatial Distribution Map Of The Wat...supporting
confidence: 69%
“…This observation showed that these parameters are higher down the river flow. A similar observation in parameter variations was made by Thomas [74] in the spatial evaluation of groundwater quality using factor analysis and geostatistical Kriging algorithm: a case study of Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis and Spatial Distribution Map Of The Wat...supporting
confidence: 69%
“…The Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric statistical test was used to evaluate significant differences among samples, sampling period, and location 59,60 . This test enables the comparison of more than two independent samples, whether they have the same or different sample sizes, and mathematically, it is expressed as 59,61 : where N corresponds to the total number of observations across all groups, g is the number of groups, n i is the number of observations in group i , r ij represents the rank of observation j from group i ,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the spatial distribution of sampling locations and the corresponding average nitrate concentrations during the observed period, 2D models of the spatial distribution of nitrate concentration were created using several interpolation methods: (1) kriging, (2) minimum curvature, (3) polynomial regression, (4) radial basis function, ( 5) inverse distance to a power, ( 6) nearest neighbor, and (7) moving average. Since the kriging method is very commonly used for such purposes [61][62][63][64][65], an additional experimental variogram was constructed for this interpolation method, in which the following theoretical variograms were fitted: (a) linear, (b) linear with nugget, (c) power, (d) power with nugget, (e) logarithmic, (f) logarithmic with nugget, (g) gaussian, and (h) exponential (Figure 5). Hence, 14 different models were created.…”
Section: Nitrate Field Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%