Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Econometric Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
144
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
144
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1). It is known that models with spatially correlated residuals may result biased estimates of the parameters which may lead to erroneous interpretation and wrong conclusions (Anselin, 1988;LeSage, 1998). This could be one of the reasons why NB models showed the wrong sign in the coefficient of average speed.…”
Section: Non-spatial Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). It is known that models with spatially correlated residuals may result biased estimates of the parameters which may lead to erroneous interpretation and wrong conclusions (Anselin, 1988;LeSage, 1998). This could be one of the reasons why NB models showed the wrong sign in the coefficient of average speed.…”
Section: Non-spatial Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to LeSage (1998), two problems arise when sample data has a locational dimension: (1) spatial correlation exists between the observations, and (2) spatial heterogeneity occurs in the relationships that are modelled. Traditional econometrics (including NB models used in crash research) has largely ignored the issue of spatial correlation that violates the traditional Gauss-Markov assumptions used in regression modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the more basic problems is the existence of strong spatial relationships between observations. These relationships can violate the basic hypothesis of multiple linear regression model residual independence (LeSage and Pace, 2010). Anselin (1988) differentiates two basic types of spatial relationships.…”
Section: Introduction and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial estimated coefficients in the previous SDM (column 5, Table 4) did not represent marginal changes in the productivity growth as consequence of changes in the explicative variables, but these coefficients require a decomposition process of the total effect into direct and indirect effects (LeSage & Pace, 2010). The direct effect captures the effects of changes in the explicative variables in company i on the productivity growth of company i.…”
Section: Panel Estimation With Spatial Interaction Effects For Agri-fmentioning
confidence: 99%