2000
DOI: 10.2307/1565414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Ecology of the Eastern Massasauga (Sistrurus c. catenatus) in a New York Peatland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the different responses may simply reflect differences in perceived risk. This interpretation is supported by the finding that non-gravid female and male eastern massasauga rattlesnakes in Pennsylvania moved an average of 9.1±1.6 m/day (Reinert and Kodrich 1982), and males in New York moved an average of 20.5±2.3 m/day (Johnson 1995). In contrast, non-gravid females and males that were subject to experimental human approaches several times weekly in Ontario (Prior and Weatherhead 1994) moved an average of 56.2±12.4 m/day (Weatherhead and Prior 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, the different responses may simply reflect differences in perceived risk. This interpretation is supported by the finding that non-gravid female and male eastern massasauga rattlesnakes in Pennsylvania moved an average of 9.1±1.6 m/day (Reinert and Kodrich 1982), and males in New York moved an average of 20.5±2.3 m/day (Johnson 1995). In contrast, non-gravid females and males that were subject to experimental human approaches several times weekly in Ontario (Prior and Weatherhead 1994) moved an average of 56.2±12.4 m/day (Weatherhead and Prior 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These results strongly imply that the high levels of structure currently observed are not a consequence of living in a highly fragmented habitat, but rather that extremely limited dispersal is a long‐standing biological feature of this taxon. Studies of the spatial ecology of massasaugas confirm that limited dispersal and localized daily movements are a general phenomenon in this species (Reinert & Kodrich 1982; Johnson 2000). This may be driven by significant advantages to philopatry for as yet unknown biological reasons (Gibbs et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A second use for population‐specific values of θ Ne is to gain a rough idea of the magnitude of the census sizes for each population. Reliable and comparable census sizes are not available for this taxon because of the difficulties of comparing the results of different survey methods used to estimate snake abundance in different locations (Johnson 2000). Nonetheless, size estimates are crucial for important conservation analyses such as Population Viability Analyses (PVA) which have been conducted for this species (Seigel & Sheil 1999; Middleton & Chu 2004; Miller 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity patterns and movement of a mobile animal reflect aspects of its behavior and ecology (Duellman and Trueb, 1986;Gregory et al, 1987). Such information is needed to formulate sound conservation and management plans for rare species (Johnson, 2000). Ecological information for such species, however, may not be readily available or may be difficult to obtain because of a species' cryptic coloration or stealthy nature.…”
Section: Fig 5 Sprint Speeds (A) and Stride Frequencies (B) From Inmentioning
confidence: 99%