2015
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evv013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Dynamics of Evolving Dosage Compensation in a Young Sex Chromosome System

Abstract: The loss of Y-linked genes during sex chromosome evolution creates a potentially deleterious low gene dosage in males. Recent studies have reported different strategies of dosage compensation. Unfortunately, most of these studies investigated taxa with comparatively old sex chromosome systems, which may limit insights into the evolution of dosage compensation and thus into the causes of different compensation strategies. Using deep RNA sequencing, we investigate differential expression patterns along the young… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(65 reference statements)
6
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The stickleback chromosome 19 is a proto-sex chromosome (Peichel et al 2004; Roesti et al 2013; Schultheiß et al 2015), with a normally recombining pseudoautosomal domain (∼0–2.5 Mb), a nonrecombining domain in the male version (Stratum I, ∼2.5–12 Mb), and a domain largely absent in the male version (Stratum II, ∼12–20 Mb). For Stratum I, parental and offspring genotypes were inspected manually in order to identify the male-specific allele and this was recoded to a unique allele code (“9”) for the purposes of linkage map construction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stickleback chromosome 19 is a proto-sex chromosome (Peichel et al 2004; Roesti et al 2013; Schultheiß et al 2015), with a normally recombining pseudoautosomal domain (∼0–2.5 Mb), a nonrecombining domain in the male version (Stratum I, ∼2.5–12 Mb), and a domain largely absent in the male version (Stratum II, ∼12–20 Mb). For Stratum I, parental and offspring genotypes were inspected manually in order to identify the male-specific allele and this was recoded to a unique allele code (“9”) for the purposes of linkage map construction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sticklebacks recently evolved sex chromosomes allowed the definition of two main strata along the X, with the older strata showing evidence of upregulation in males and overexpression in females at least for a subset of genes [98]. Complete dosage compensation by upregulation of the male X chromosome evolved independently in Drosophila melanogaster and in a mosquito Anopheles stephensi [99], while in another insect, Heliconius butterfly, there is only partial dosage compensation [100].…”
Section: Dosage Compensation Between Sex Chromosomes and Autosomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in gene dose is often thought to be detrimental, and different mechanisms of dosage compensation have evolved to address the differences in sex chromosome dose in some organisms (Mank 2013). Dosage compensation mechanisms in several organisms show extensive regional variation, with some regions exhibiting less complete compensation than other regions on the therian (Carrel and Willard 2005) and stickleback (Schultheiß et al 2015) X chromosomes.Second, independent of gene dose differences, sex chromosomes are also inherited unequally between the sexes, leading to distinct evolutionary forces relative to the autosomes (Rice 1984;Charlesworth et al 1987). In particular, conflicting selection on males and females results in unequal sex-specific selection pressures acting on the sex chromosomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in gene dose is often thought to be detrimental, and different mechanisms of dosage compensation have evolved to address the differences in sex chromosome dose in some organisms (Mank 2013). Dosage compensation mechanisms in several organisms show extensive regional variation, with some regions exhibiting less complete compensation than other regions on the therian (Carrel and Willard 2005) and stickleback (Schultheiß et al 2015) X chromosomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%