2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distributions and probabilistic risk assessment of exposure to heavy metals in groundwater in a peri-urban settlement: case study of Atonsu-Kumasi, Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean Na-concentrations (29,292 μgL −1 ) of this study is relatively higher than the literature data mentioned in Table 2 , except for the drinking water sources from Rangpur, Bangladesh [ 78 ] and Nigeria [ 79 ]. In contrast, the average concentration of K (2239 μgL −1 ) is relatively lower compared to the literature data, except for Ghana [ 80 ] and Saudi Arabia [ 81 ]. Similarly, the average content of Ca (41,584 μgL −1 ) is higher than in Rangpur, Bangladesh [ 78 ], Ghana [ 80 ], and Saudi Arabia [ 81 ], but lower than in Jamalpur, Bangladesh [ 82 ], France [ 25 ], and Nigeria [ 79 ].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Mean Na-concentrations (29,292 μgL −1 ) of this study is relatively higher than the literature data mentioned in Table 2 , except for the drinking water sources from Rangpur, Bangladesh [ 78 ] and Nigeria [ 79 ]. In contrast, the average concentration of K (2239 μgL −1 ) is relatively lower compared to the literature data, except for Ghana [ 80 ] and Saudi Arabia [ 81 ]. Similarly, the average content of Ca (41,584 μgL −1 ) is higher than in Rangpur, Bangladesh [ 78 ], Ghana [ 80 ], and Saudi Arabia [ 81 ], but lower than in Jamalpur, Bangladesh [ 82 ], France [ 25 ], and Nigeria [ 79 ].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Moreover, Table 2 also represents the comparison between some existing literature data (Zakir et al, 2020;Saha et al, 2019;Rahman et al, 2013;Bodrud-doza et al, 2020;Kumar et al, 2019;Maw et al, 2020;Abeer et al, 2020;Muhammad et al, 2011;Mohammadi et al, 2019;Qiao et al, 2020;Dong et al, 2020;Nguyen et al, 2020;Le bot et al, 2016;Momot et al, 2005;Szuster-Janiaczyk et al, 2018;Abdeldayem, 2019;Opoku et al, 2020;Egbueri et al, 2020) and the determined heavy metal(oid)s concentrations in the tap water samples of the present study. In comparison to literature data, the mean concentration of Fe, Cr, Pb, Co, Ni, Cd were obtained significantly higher than the tabulated literature data, contrariwise, As concentration in the present study were much lower than the literature data.…”
Section: Metal(oid)s In Tap Water and Their Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Though, the total ingested dose of PHEs is not always equal to their percentage of body absorbed pollutant dose in reality since some fraction of the ingested PHEs may be excreted, but the remainder accumulates in body tissues where they can affect human health (Horiguchi et al, 2004;Opoku et al 2020).…”
Section: Metal Concentration Factormentioning
confidence: 99%