2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution, source identification and ecological risk assessment of POPs and heavy metals in lake sediments of Istanbul, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the potential toxic effect of particular HMs based on the Sediment Quality Guidelines showed concentrations higher than PEC values in only three cases. In single samples, concentrations of Cu, Cd, and Pb higher than PEC values were recorded in Lakes Wielkie (70), Trzebuń (65), and Kaleńskie (22), respectively. Concentration values in a range from midpoint effect concentration (MEC) to probable effect concentration (PEC) occurred once for Cr, Cu, and Cd.…”
Section: Ecotoxicity Of Hmsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis of the potential toxic effect of particular HMs based on the Sediment Quality Guidelines showed concentrations higher than PEC values in only three cases. In single samples, concentrations of Cu, Cd, and Pb higher than PEC values were recorded in Lakes Wielkie (70), Trzebuń (65), and Kaleńskie (22), respectively. Concentration values in a range from midpoint effect concentration (MEC) to probable effect concentration (PEC) occurred once for Cr, Cu, and Cd.…”
Section: Ecotoxicity Of Hmsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The combined assessment of surface sediment contamination based on PLI indicates that the sediments were not polluted with HMs only in 25% of the lakes. Güzel et al 70 found that slight and moderate concentration of heavy metals, such as Pb and Zn, were present in most of the sampling points according to PLI and I geo values. Accordingly, to recognize the amount of anthropogenic input, the enrichment factor (EF) was calculated for the studied heavy metals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PEF is the soil dust generation factor m3/kg; SA is the skin contact surface area, cm 2 /d; AF is the skin's adsorption coefficient, mg/cm 2 ; ABS is the skin absorption rate,%; EF is the exposure frequency, d/a; ED is the exposure period/a; BW is the body mass, kg; AT is the average action time, d.The environmental risk assessment standards for adults and children are quite different when conducting Exposure assessment. According to China's site environmental assessment guidelines, the USEPA health risk assessment method and the actual research conclusions at home and abroad in recent years(Hasanzadeh and Malakootian et al, 2022;Aly-Eldeen and Shreadah et al, 2023;Hou and Zhao et al, 2023;Jin and Zhao et al, 2023;Pandion and Arunachalam et al, 2023;Siddique and Chaudhry et al, 2023;Zheng and Lu et al, 2023), the values of each Exposure assessment parameter in this assessment are shown in Table2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%